Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Mar;27(3):e363-9.
doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2012.04689.x. Epub 2012 Aug 29.

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of safety and efficacy of miltefosine in antihistamine-resistant chronic spontaneous urticaria

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of safety and efficacy of miltefosine in antihistamine-resistant chronic spontaneous urticaria

M Magerl et al. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), a mast cell-driven condition, is debilitating, common, and hard to treat. Miltefosine, a lipid raft modulator, can inhibit mast cell responses in vivo.

Objective: To study the safety and efficacy of systemic miltefosine treatment in CSU patients resistant to standard-dosed antihistamines.

Methods: In this investigator-initiated multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, CSU patients were treated for 4 weeks with daily doses of up to 150-mg miltefosine (n = 47) or placebo (n = 26). Disease activity was assessed using the urticaria activity score. Safety and tolerability of miltefosine were also assessed.

Results: After 4 weeks of treatment, Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) levels were substantially more reduced in miltefosine-treated patients (-6.3 vs. -3.5 in placebo-treated patients; P = 0.05). Also, the number of weals, but not the intensity of pruritus, was significantly reduced in miltefosine-treated patients vs. placebo-treated patients (P = 0.02). In general, adverse events were frequent in both groups (miltefosine: 88%, placebo: 65% of patients) but mostly mild to moderate in severity. We did not observe any serious adverse events.

Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that miltefosine is an effective and safe treatment option for CSU patients who do not respond to standard-dosed antihistamines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types