Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Aug 28:11:58.
doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-11-58.

Probiotics, prebiotics infant formula use in preterm or low birth weight infants: a systematic review

Affiliations

Probiotics, prebiotics infant formula use in preterm or low birth weight infants: a systematic review

Mary N Mugambi et al. Nutr J. .

Abstract

Background: Previous reviews (2005 to 2009) on preterm infants given probiotics or prebiotics with breast milk or mixed feeds focused on prevention of Necrotizing Enterocolitis, sepsis and diarrhea. This review assessed if probiotics, prebiotics led to improved growth and clinical outcomes in formula fed preterm infants.

Methods: Cochrane methodology was followed using randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which compared preterm formula containing probiotic(s) or prebiotic(s) to conventional preterm formula in preterm infants. The mean difference (MD) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported for continuous outcomes, risk ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% CI for dichotomous outcomes. Heterogeneity was assessed by visual inspection of forest plots and a chi² test. An I² test assessed inconsistencies across studies. I²> 50% represented substantial heterogeneity.

Results: Four probiotics studies (N=212), 4 prebiotics studies (N=126) were included. Probiotics: There were no significant differences in weight gain (MD 1.96, 95% CI: -2.64 to 6.56, 2 studies, n=34) or in maximal enteral feed (MD 35.20, 95% CI: -7.61 to 78.02, 2 studies, n=34), number of stools per day increased significantly in probiotic group (MD 1.60, 95% CI: 1.20 to 2.00, 1 study, n=20). Prebiotics: Galacto-oligosaccharide/Fructo-oligosaccharide (GOS/FOS) yielded no significant difference in weight gain (MD 0.04, 95% CI: -2.65 to 2.73, 2 studies, n=50), GOS/FOS yielded no significant differences in length gain (MD 0.01, 95% CI: -0.03 to 0.04, 2 studies, n=50). There were no significant differences in head growth (MD -0.01, 95% CI: -0.02 to 0.00, 2 studies, n=76) or age at full enteral feed (MD -0.79, 95% CI: -2.20 to 0.61, 2 studies, n=86). Stool frequency increased significantly in prebiotic group (MD 0.80, 95% CI: 0.48 to 1.1, 2 studies, n=86). GOS/FOS and FOS yielded higher bifidobacteria counts in prebiotics group (MD 2.10, 95% CI: 0.96 to 3.24, n=27) and (MD 0.48, 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.68, n=56).

Conclusions: There is not enough evidence to state that supplementation with probiotics or prebiotics results in improved growth and clinical outcomes in exclusively formula fed preterm infants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study eligibility form.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Process followed in the selection of studies.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Methodological quality of included studies.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effect of probiotic administration on weight gain (g/day).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Effect of probiotic administration on NEC.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Effect of probiotic administration on sepsis.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Effect of prebiotic administration of weight gain (g/day).
Figure 8
Figure 8
Effect of prebiotic administration of linear growth (cm/week).
Figure 9
Figure 9
Effect of prebiotic administration on stool frequency.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Effect of prebiotic administration on total counts of Bifidobacteria.

References

    1. Anderson DM. In: Handbook of Pediatric Nutrition. 3. Samour PQ, Helm KK, editor. James and Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury, Massachusetts; 2005. From Pediatric Nutrition; pp. 53–71.
    1. Lissauer T, Clayden G. Illustrated Text book of Pediatrics. 3. Elsevier, Mosby; 2007. Neonatal Medicine; pp. 145–168.
    1. Georgieff MK. In: Avery’s Neonatology pathophysiology and management of the new born. 6. MacDonald MG, Seshia MMK, Mullet MD, editor. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia; 2005. Nutrition; pp. 380–381.
    1. Lissauer T, Fanaroff A. The preterm infant: growth and nutrition. In Neonatology at a glance. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, Mass; 2006. pp. 76–77.
    1. Uhing MR, Das UG. Optimizing growth in the preterm infant. Clin Perinatol. 2009;36:165–176. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2008.09.010. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types