Towards a universal model of reading
- PMID: 22929057
- PMCID: PMC3677812
- DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X11001841
Towards a universal model of reading
Abstract
In the last decade, reading research has seen a paradigmatic shift. A new wave of computational models of orthographic processing that offer various forms of noisy position or context-sensitive coding have revolutionized the field of visual word recognition. The influx of such models stems mainly from consistent findings, coming mostly from European languages, regarding an apparent insensitivity of skilled readers to letter order. Underlying the current revolution is the theoretical assumption that the insensitivity of readers to letter order reflects the special way in which the human brain encodes the position of letters in printed words. The present article discusses the theoretical shortcomings and misconceptions of this approach to visual word recognition. A systematic review of data obtained from a variety of languages demonstrates that letter-order insensitivity is neither a general property of the cognitive system nor a property of the brain in encoding letters. Rather, it is a variant and idiosyncratic characteristic of some languages, mostly European, reflecting a strategy of optimizing encoding resources, given the specific structure of words. Since the main goal of reading research is to develop theories that describe the fundamental and invariant phenomena of reading across orthographies, an alternative approach to model visual word recognition is offered. The dimensions of a possible universal model of reading, which outlines the common cognitive operations involved in orthographic processing in all writing systems, are discussed.
Comment in
-
Are there universals of reading? We don't believe so.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):282-3. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000155. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929002
-
Writing systems: not optimal, but good enough.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):305-7. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000337. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929003
-
An even more universal model of reading: various effects of orthography on dyslexias.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):285-6. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000167. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929021
-
Visual word recognition models should also be constrained by knowledge about the visual system.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):287. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000179. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929059
-
Can evolution provide perfectly optimal solutions for a universal model of reading?Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):279-80. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000015. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929084
-
Flashing out or fleshing out? A developmental perspective on a universal model of reading.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):289-90. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000180. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929106
-
Position-invariant letter identification is a key component of any universal model of reading.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):281-2. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000027. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929120
-
Flexible letter-position coding is unlikely to hold for morphologically rich languages.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):290-1. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000192. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929147
-
Developing a universal model of reading necessitates cracking the orthographic code.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):283-4. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000039. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929150
-
Orthographic consistency and parafoveal preview benefit: a resource-sharing account of language differences in processing of phonological and semantic codes.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):292-3. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000209. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929177
-
Bringing development into a universal model of reading.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):284. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000040. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929181
-
Universals of reading: developmental evidence for linguistic plausibility.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):287-8. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000052. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929206
-
Beyond isolated word recognition.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):293-4. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000210. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929212
-
Visual perceptual limitations on letter position uncertainty in reading.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):294-5. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000222. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929297
-
Explaining word recognition, reading, the universe, and beyond: a modest proposal.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):288-9. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000064. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929307
-
Thru but not wisht: language, writing, and universal reading theory.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):299-300. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000234. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929328
-
Consideration of the linguistic characteristics of letters makes the universal model of reading more universal.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):291-2. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000076. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929385
-
Rethinking phonological theories of reading.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):303-4. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000246. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929405
-
No reason to expect "reading universals".Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):293. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000088. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929460
-
Phono-morpho-orthographic construal: the view from spelling.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):304. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000258. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929518
-
What and where is the word?Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):295-6. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1200009X. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929541
-
The limitations of the reverse-engineering approach to cognitive modeling.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):305. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1200026X. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929543
-
Orthographic processing is universal; it's what you do with it that's different.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):296-7. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000106. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929590
-
Frost and fogs, or sunny skies? Orthography, reading, and misplaced optimalism.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):307-8. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000271. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929596
-
Perceptual uncertainty is a property of the cognitive system.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):298-9. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000118. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929618
-
Towards a universal neurobiological architecture for learning to read.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):308-9. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000283. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929623
-
Vision, development, and bilingualism are fundamental in the quest for a universal model of visual word recognition and reading.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):300-1. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1200012X. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929657
-
Giving theories of reading a sporting chance.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):301-2. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000301. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929663
-
The study of orthographic processing has broadened research in visual word recognition.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):309-10. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000131. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929756
-
The case of the neglected alphasyllabary: orthographic processing in Devanagari.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):302-3. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000313. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929807
-
Beyond one-way streets: the interaction of phonology, morphology, and culture with orthography.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):280-1. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000143. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929865
-
Theories of reading should predict reading speed.Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):297-8. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000325. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22929907 Free PMC article.
-
Does a focus on universals represent a new trend in word recognition?Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):285. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000295. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2012. PMID: 22931560 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Adelman JS, Marquis SJ, Sabatos-DeVito MG. Letters in words are read simultaneously, not in left-to-right sequence. Psychological Science. 2011;21:1799–1801. - PubMed
-
- Bentin S, Frost R. Processing lexical ambiguity and visual word recognition in a deep orthography. Memory & Cognition. 1987;15:13–23. - PubMed
-
- Bentin S, Hammer R, Cahan S. The effects of aging and first grade schooling on the development of phonological awareness. American Psychological Science. 1991;2:271–274.
-
- Bertelson P, Morais J, Alegria J, Content A. Phonetic analysis capacity and learning to read. Nature. 1985;313:73–74.
-
- Bertram R, Hyönä J. The length of a complex word modifies the role of morphological structure: Evidence from reading short and long Finnish compounds. Journal of Memory & Language. 2003;48:615–634.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
