Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Aug;33(3):95-100.

Harmonisation of Measurement Procedures: how do we get it done?

Mary Lou Gantzer  1 , W Greg Miller
Affiliations

Harmonisation of Measurement Procedures: how do we get it done?

Mary Lou Gantzer et al. Clin Biochem Rev. 2012 Aug.

Abstract

Clinical laboratory measurement results must be comparable among different measurement procedures, different locations and different times in order to be used appropriately for identifying and managing disease conditions. Harmonisation in the broad sense is the overall process of achieving comparability of results among clinical laboratory measurement procedures that measure the same measurand. The term standardisation is used when comparable results among measurement procedures are based on calibration traceability to SI using a reference measurement procedure of the highest available order. When there is no higher order reference measurement procedure available, and it is unlikely that one can be developed, the term harmonisation refers to any process for achieving comparable results among measurement procedures for an individual measurand.This review explains calibration traceability and focuses on the principles of harmonisation for those measurands for which a reference measurement procedure does not exist. We discuss the value of harmonisation, the importance of commutable reference materials, the barriers to harmonisation that exist today, and conclude with a discussion of a current global effort to improve the state of harmonisation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Calibration traceability chain.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A suggested approach for the global management of harmonisation activities for a measurand. (modified with permission from Ref. 14).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Chalkidou K, Whicher D, Kary W, Tunis S. Comparative effectiveness research priorities: Identifying critical gaps in evidence for clinical and health policy decision making. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25:241–8. - PubMed
    1. McLawhon RW. Patient safety and clinical effectiveness as imperatives for achieving harmonization inside and outside the clinical laboratory. Clin Chem. 2011;57:936–8. - PubMed
    1. Vesper HW, Wilson PW, Rifai N. A message from the laboratory community to the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel IV. Clin Chem. 2012;58:523–7. - PubMed
    1. Binkley N, Krueger D, Cowgill CS, Plum L, Lake E, Hansen KE, et al. Assay variation confounds the diagnosis of hypovitaminosis D: a call for standardization. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:3152–7. - PubMed
    1. Sturgeon CM, Sprague SM, Metcalfe W. Variation in parathyroid hormone immunoassay results—a critical governance issue in the management of chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26:3440–5. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources