Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun;11(3):253-8.
doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01081.x. Epub 2012 Aug 30.

Use of a risk assessment method to improve the safety of negative pressure wound therapy

Anne-Sophie Lelong  1 , Nicolas Martelli, Brigitte Bonan, Patrice Prognon, Judith Pineau
Affiliations

Use of a risk assessment method to improve the safety of negative pressure wound therapy

Anne-Sophie Lelong et al. Int Wound J. 2014 Jun.

Abstract

To conduct a risk analysis of the negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) care process and to improve the safety of NPWT, a working group of nurses, hospital pharmacists, physicians and hospital managers performed a risk analysis for the process of NPWT care. The failure modes, effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) method was used for this analysis. Failure modes and their consequences were defined and classified as a function of their criticality to identify priority actions for improvement. By contrast to classical FMECA, the criticality index (CI) of each consequence was calculated by multiplying occurrence, severity and detection scores. We identified 13 failure modes, leading to 20 different consequences. The CI of consequences was initially 712, falling to 357 after corrective measures were implemented. The major improvements proposed included the establishment of 6-monthly training cycles for nurses, physicians and surgeons and the introduction of computerised prescription for NPWT. The FMECA method also made it possible to prioritise actions as a function of the criticality ranking of consequences and was easily understood and used by the working group. This study is, to our knowledge, the first to use the FMECA method to improve the safety of NPWT.

Keywords: Negative pressure wound therapy; Risk analysis; Safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kamolz L‐P, Andel H, Haslik W, Winter W, Meissl G, Frey M. Use of subatmospheric pressure therapy to prevent burn wound progression in human: first experiences. Burns 2004;30:253–8. - PubMed
    1. Orgill DP, Bayer LR. Update on negative‐pressure wound therapy. Plast Recons Surg 2011;127:105S–115S. - PubMed
    1. Fraccalvieri M, Zingarelli E, Ruka E, Antoniotti U, Coda R, Sarno A, Bocchiotti MA, Bruschi S. Negative pressure wound therapy using gauze and foam: histological, immunohistochemical and ultrasonography morphological analysis of the granulation tissue and scar tissue. Preliminary report of a clinical study. Int Wound J 2011;8:355–64. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vuerstaek JDD, Vainas T, Wuite J, Nelemans P, Neumann MHA, Veraart JCJM. State‐of‐the‐art treatment of chronic leg ulcers: a randomized controlled trial comparing vacuum‐assisted closure (V.A.C.) with modern wound dressings. J Vasc Surg 2006;44:1029–37.[Discussion 1038]. - PubMed
    1. Anesäter E, Borgquist O, Hedström E, Waga J, Ingemansson R, Malmsjö M. The influence of different sizes and types of wound fillers on wound contraction and tissue pressure during negative pressure wound therapy. Int Wound J 2011;8:336–42. - PMC - PubMed