Can hearing puter activate pupil? Phonological competition and the processing of reduced spoken words in spontaneous conversations
- PMID: 22934784
- DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2012.693109
Can hearing puter activate pupil? Phonological competition and the processing of reduced spoken words in spontaneous conversations
Abstract
In listeners' daily communicative exchanges, they most often hear casual speech, in which words are often produced with fewer segments, rather than the careful speech used in most psycholinguistic experiments. Three experiments examined phonological competition during the recognition of reduced forms such as [pjutər] for computer using a target-absent variant of the visual world paradigm. Listeners' eye movements were tracked upon hearing canonical and reduced forms as they looked at displays of four printed words. One of the words was phonologically similar to the canonical pronunciation of the target word, one word was similar to the reduced pronunciation, and two words served as unrelated distractors. When spoken targets were presented in isolation (Experiment 1) and in sentential contexts (Experiment 2), competition was modulated as a function of the target word form. When reduced targets were presented in sentential contexts, listeners were probabilistically more likely to first fixate reduced-form competitors before shifting their eye gaze to canonical-form competitors. Experiment 3, in which the original /p/ from [pjutər] was replaced with a "real" onset /p/, showed an effect of cross-splicing in the late time window. We conjecture that these results fit best with the notion that speech reductions initially activate competitors that are similar to the phonological surface form of the reduction, but that listeners nevertheless can exploit fine phonetic detail to reconstruct strongly reduced forms to their canonical counterparts.
Similar articles
-
How phonological reductions sometimes help the listener.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 May;39(3):977-84. doi: 10.1037/a0029196. Epub 2012 Jul 16. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013. PMID: 22799281
-
Visual word recognition during reading is followed by subvocal articulation.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Mar;36(2):457-70. doi: 10.1037/a0018278. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010. PMID: 20192542
-
Tracking recognition of spoken words by tracking looks to printed words.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 May;60(5):661-71. doi: 10.1080/17470210601183890. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007. PMID: 17455074
-
Reduced speech: All is variability.Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2019 Jul;10(4):e1496. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1496. Epub 2019 Feb 27. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2019. PMID: 30811095 Review.
-
Eye movements as a window into real-time spoken language comprehension in natural contexts.J Psycholinguist Res. 1995 Nov;24(6):409-36. doi: 10.1007/BF02143160. J Psycholinguist Res. 1995. PMID: 8531168 Review.
Cited by
-
Glottal stops do not constrain lexical access as do oral stops.PLoS One. 2021 Nov 19;16(11):e0259573. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259573. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34797821 Free PMC article.
-
The role of segmental and durational cues in the processing of reduced words.Lang Speech. 2018 Sep;61(3):358-383. doi: 10.1177/0023830917727774. Epub 2017 Sep 4. Lang Speech. 2018. PMID: 28870139 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources