Negative priming for target selection with saccadic eye movements
- PMID: 22936100
- DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3234-1
Negative priming for target selection with saccadic eye movements
Abstract
We conducted a series of experiments to determine whether negative priming is used in the process of target selection for a saccadic eye movement. The key questions addressed the circumstances in which the negative priming of an object takes place, and the distinction between spatial and object-based effects. Experiment 1 revealed that after fixating a target (cricket ball) amongst an array of semantically related distracters, saccadic eye movements in a subsequent display were faster to the target than to the distracters or new objects, irrespective of location. The main finding was that of the facilitation of a recent target, not the inhibition of a recent distracter or location. Experiment 2 replicated this finding by using silhouettes of objects for selection that is based on feature shape. Error rates were associated with distracters with high target-shape similarity; therefore, Experiment 3 presented silhouettes of animals using distracters with low target-shape similarity. The pattern of results was similar to that of Experiment 2, with clear evidence of target facilitation rather than the inhibition of distracters. Experiment 4 and 5 introduced a distracter together with the target into the probe display, to generate a level of competitive selection in the probe condition. In these circumstances, clear evidence of spatial inhibition at the location of the previous distracters emerged. We discuss the implications for our understanding of selective attention and consider why it is essential to supplement response time data with the analysis of eye movement behaviour in spatial negative priming paradigms.
Similar articles
-
The eye that binds: Feature integration is not disrupted by saccadic eye movements.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Feb;82(2):533-549. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01873-7. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020. PMID: 31808114 Free PMC article.
-
The inhibitory effect of a recent distracter.Vision Res. 2005 Dec;45(27):3365-78. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.07.024. Epub 2005 Sep 19. Vision Res. 2005. PMID: 16171841 Clinical Trial.
-
Trans-saccadic repetition priming: ERPs reveal on-line integration of information across words.Neuropsychologia. 2016 Jan 8;80:201-211. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.11.025. Epub 2015 Dec 2. Neuropsychologia. 2016. PMID: 26656872 Free PMC article.
-
Investigating saccade programming in the praying mantis Tenodera aridifolia using distracter interference paradigms.J Insect Physiol. 2006 Oct;52(10):1062-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2006.07.006. Epub 2006 Aug 18. J Insect Physiol. 2006. PMID: 16997321
-
Neural mechanisms underlying target selection with saccadic eye movements.Prog Brain Res. 2005;149:157-71. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(05)49012-3. Prog Brain Res. 2005. PMID: 16226583 Review.
Cited by
-
The inhibitory effect of a recent distractor: singleton vs. multiple distractors.Exp Brain Res. 2024 Jul;242(7):1745-1759. doi: 10.1007/s00221-024-06846-3. Epub 2024 May 31. Exp Brain Res. 2024. PMID: 38819649 Free PMC article.
-
Oculomotor and Inhibitory Control in Dyslexia.Front Syst Neurosci. 2019 Jan 8;12:66. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2018.00066. eCollection 2018. Front Syst Neurosci. 2019. PMID: 30687026 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources