Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Aug 24:6:55.
doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00055. eCollection 2012.

Isolating a cerebellar contribution to rapid visual attention using transcranial magnetic stimulation

Affiliations

Isolating a cerebellar contribution to rapid visual attention using transcranial magnetic stimulation

Carla P Arasanz et al. Front Behav Neurosci. .

Abstract

Patient and neuroimaging research have provided increasing support for a role of the posterior-lateral cerebellum in cognition, particularly attention. During rapid serial visual presentation, when two targets are presented in close temporal proximity (<500 ms), accuracy at detecting the second target (T2) suffers. This phenomenon is known as the attentional blink (AB), and in cerebellar lesion patients this effect is exaggerated. Damage to the cerebellum may thus disrupt the use of attentional resources during stimulus processing conditions that are temporally demanding. There are reciprocal connections between the cerebral cortex and the contralateral cerebellum, these connections allow for the possibility that lateralized functions in the cerebral cortex (such as language) remain lateralized in the cerebellum. The purpose of this study was to investigate the temporal characteristics of the cerebellar contribution to the AB and to functionally localize the contribution of the cerebellum to the AB using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). We hypothesized that T2 accuracy would decrease after right cerebellar stimulation when the delay between the first target (T1) and T2 was short (120-400 ms) compared to long (720-960 ms). We used continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS), a form of TMS, to transiently inhibit a focal population of neurons in the left and right posterior-lateral cerebellum of healthy participants (n = 45). Three groups of participants (n = 15) performed the AB before and after either sham, left, or right cerebellar stimulation. The results of this cTBS study support our hypothesis. During the short delay, participants in the right cTBS group showed a greater AB magnitude compared to both the left and sham cTBS groups (p < 0.05). No difference in T2 detection was found over long delays. The results provide further support for a cerebellar contribution to an integrated neural network recruited during temporally demanding attention-based tasks.

Keywords: attentional blink; cerebellum; cognition; theta burst stimulation; visual attention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An illustration of the stimuli used in the attentional blink task. Stimuli were presented at a rate of 120 ms with no inter-stimulus interval (ISI). Participants were to first detect whether a white target (T1) was embedded among black distractors. T1 was either an H or S and on one-third of the trials was replaced by a black distractor. Participants then needed to detect a second target (T2) that randomly occurred 1–8 lags after T1 and was black like the distractors. T2 was present in every trial and was either an X or Y.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) PRE: Performance (Mean % accuracy ± S.E.M) in detecting T2 for the Left, Right, and Sham group during pre-cTBS condition. There was no significant difference in performance between groups at any lag. Time between each lag was 120 ms. (B) POST: Performance (Mean % accuracy ± S.E.M) in detecting T2 for the Left, Right and Sham group during post-cTBS condition. Paired contrasts reveal a significant difference between the right group and both the left and sham group for lags 1–4, *p < 0.05. Time between each lag was 120 ms, and T2 at lags 1–4 occurred within 480 ms of T1.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Akshoomoff N. A., Courchesne E., Press G. A., Iragui V. (1992). Contribution of the cerebellum to neuropsychological functioning: evidence from a case of cerebellar degenerative disorder. Neuropsychologia 30, 315–328 10.1016/0028-3932(92)90105-U - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allen G., McColl R., Barnard H., Ringe W. K., Fleckenstein J., Cullum C. M. (2005). Magnetic resonance imaging of cerebellar-prefrontal and cerebellar-parietal functional connectivity. Neuroimage 28, 39–48 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Appollonio I. M., Grafman J., Schwartz V., Massaquoi S., Hallett M. (1993). Memory in patients with cerebellar degeneration. Neurology 43, 1536–1544 - PubMed
    1. Arasanz C. P., Staines W. R., Roy E. A., Schweizer T. A. (2012). The cerebellum and its role in word generation: a cTBS study. Cortex 48, 718–724 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.02.021 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Broadbent D. E., Broadbent M. H. (1987). From detection to identification: response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation. Percept. Psychophys. 42, 105–113 - PubMed