Evaluation of medical consultation letters at King Fahd Hospital, Al Hufuf, Saudi Arabia
- PMID: 22937194
- PMCID: PMC3428174
Evaluation of medical consultation letters at King Fahd Hospital, Al Hufuf, Saudi Arabia
Abstract
Background: In surgical wards, it is of paramount importance to communicate with other health care providers, mostly physicians, referring patients to them for their consultation on any health conditions that affect pre-operative, operative and post-operative patient care. The purposes of this investigation were to assess the appropriateness of physician responses in medical consultation reports and compare physician responses when using these reports from different levels of health care providers.
Methods: This study was conducted in Al-Hufuf, Saudi Arabia. The researchers evaluated all the surgical consultation letters in the files during the period between March 2010 and March 2011. From the explored 234 files, only 200 consultation letters were chosen as there was a referral data plus consultation data in the same file. We evaluated the quality of consultation report included the ethical concerns towards colleagues and patient, consideration of patient safety in all opinions, comprehensive pertinent scientific information, addressing the patient's medical condition with putting possible differential diagnosis, conclusion and precise management plans suggested.
Results: The results showed that the specialists' consultation letters had the highest percentage of fulfillment of all the six items in the consultation report. There is no uniform existing consultation report form.
Conclusion: Specialist form showed the highest number of mentioning the diagnosis. Consultant form showed the highest number of mentioning the concise aim of referral. The highest percentage of all categories mentioned all items in consultation report with a good level were the specialists.
Keywords: Medical consultation; Saudi Arabia; referring patients.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The quality of communication about older patients between hospital physicians and general practitioners: a panel study assessment.BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Aug 24;7:133. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-133. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007. PMID: 17718921 Free PMC article.
-
A study to assess the quality of information in referral letters to the orthodontic department at Kingston Hospital, Surrey.Prim Dent Care. 2010 Apr;17(2):73-7. doi: 10.1308/135576110791013712. Prim Dent Care. 2010. PMID: 20353655
-
Patterns of referral in the Family Medicine Department in Southeastern Saudi Arabia.Saudi Med J. 2010 Aug;31(8):925-30. Saudi Med J. 2010. PMID: 20714694
-
Valued Components of a Consultant Letter from Referring Physicians' Perspective: a Systematic Literature Synthesis.J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jun;33(6):948-954. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4356-3. Epub 2018 Mar 5. J Gen Intern Med. 2018. PMID: 29508258 Free PMC article.
-
Key Components of Traditional Consultation Letters and Their Relevance to Electronic Consultation Replies: A Systematic Review.Telemed J E Health. 2020 Jun;26(6):689-699. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2019.0161. Epub 2019 Oct 9. Telemed J E Health. 2020. PMID: 31596680
Cited by
-
The Referral System between Primary and Secondary Health Care in Saudi Arabia for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review.J Diabetes Res. 2017;2017:4183604. doi: 10.1155/2017/4183604. Epub 2017 May 29. J Diabetes Res. 2017. PMID: 28634586 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Epstein RM. Communication between primary care physicians and consultants. Archives of Family Medicine. 1995;4:403–9. - PubMed
-
- Greenberg MS, Glick M. 10th ed. Hamilton, Ontario: BC Decker; 2003. Burket's oral medicine; pp. 5–31.
-
- Geist SM, Geist JR. Improvement in Medical Consultation Responses with a Structured Request Form. J Dent Educ. 2008 May;72(5):553–61. - PubMed
-
- Frank JR, editor. Better care. Ottawa: The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2005. The CanMEDS 2005 physician competency framework. Better standards. Better physicians.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources