Occupational exposures to noise resulting from the workplace use of personal media players at a manufacturing facility
- PMID: 22937995
- DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2012.713768
Occupational exposures to noise resulting from the workplace use of personal media players at a manufacturing facility
Abstract
This study examined the contribution of noise exposures from personal media player (PMP) use in the workplace to overall employee noise exposures at a Colorado manufacturing facility. A total of 24 workers' PMP and background noise exposures were measured. Twelve PMP users worked in high-background-noise exposure (HBNE) areas, and 12 worked in low-background-noise exposure (LBNE) areas. The self-selected PMP listening level of each worker was measured using an ear simulator, and the background noise of each employee workstation was measured using a sound level meter. Workers' self-reported PMP duration of use, PMP listening exposure levels, and background noise levels were used to estimate the daily occupational noise exposures. Measured background noise levels averaged 81 dBA for HBNE workers and 59 dBA for LBNE workers. Measured, free-field equivalent listening exposure levels were significantly greater for HBNE workers (85 dBA) compared with LBNE workers (75 dBA) (p = 0.0006). Estimated mean daily noise exposures for both groups were below the ACGIH threshold limit value for noise of 85 dBA8-hr time weighted average (TWA), specifically 84 dBA TWA for HBNE workers and 72 dBA TWA for LBNE workers. Three of 12 (25%) HBNE workers had estimated exposures greater than 85 dBA TWA when only background noise was considered, yet when PMP use was also considered, 6 of 12 (50%) had estimated exposures greater than 85 dBA TWA, suggesting that PMP use doubled the number of overexposed workers. None of the LBNE workers had estimated exposures greater than 85 dBA TWA. The contribution of PMP use to overall noise exposures was substantially less among HBNE workers than LBNE workers due to the disproportionate selection of noise-attenuating headsets among HBNE workers compared with LBNE workers. It is recommended that the facility management either restrict workplace PMP use among HBNE workers or require output-limiting technology to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss.
Similar articles
-
Noise exposures of rail workers at a North American chemical facility.Am J Ind Med. 2005 Apr;47(4):364-9. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20152. Am J Ind Med. 2005. PMID: 15776466
-
Occupational noise exposures among three farm families in northwest Ohio.J Agromedicine. 2008;13(3):165-74. doi: 10.1080/10599240802406049. J Agromedicine. 2008. PMID: 19064421
-
Noise exposure and hearing conservation practices in an industry with high incidence of workers' compensation claims for hearing loss.Am J Ind Med. 2002 Oct;42(4):309-17. doi: 10.1002/ajim.10124. Am J Ind Med. 2002. PMID: 12271478
-
Occupational hearing conservation.Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1991 Apr;24(2):403-14. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1991. PMID: 1857619 Review.
-
Comparison of occupational noise legislation in the Americas: an overview and analysis.Noise Health. 2014 Sep-Oct;16(72):306-19. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.140511. Noise Health. 2014. PMID: 25209041 Review.
Cited by
-
ICBEN review of research on the biological effects of noise 2011-2014.Noise Health. 2015 Mar-Apr;17(75):57-82. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.153373. Noise Health. 2015. PMID: 25774609 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical