Why are psychiatric imaging methods clinically unreliable? Conclusions and practical guidelines for authors, editors and reviewers
- PMID: 22938624
- PMCID: PMC3478220
- DOI: 10.1186/1744-9081-8-46
Why are psychiatric imaging methods clinically unreliable? Conclusions and practical guidelines for authors, editors and reviewers
Abstract
No reliable anatomical or functional alterations have been confirmed in psychiatric neuroimaging; however it can become reliable with translational impact on clinical practice when considering crucial methodological issues. We provide guidelines to authors, editors and reviewers in the implementation/evaluation of neuroimaging studies to bend neuroimaging to be more than basic neuroscience.
References
-
- Johnstone EC, Crow TJ, Frith CD, Husband J, Kreel L. Cerebral ventricular size and cognitive impairment in chronic schizophrenia. Lancet. 1976;7992:924–926. - PubMed
-
- Fusar-Poli P, Bhattacharyya S, Allen P, Crippa JA, Borgwardt S, Martin-Santos R, Seal M, O’Carroll C, Atakan Z, Zuardi AW, McGuire P. Effect of image analysis software on neurofunctional activation during processing of emotional human faces. J Clin Neurosci. 2010;17:311–314. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2009.06.027. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources