Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Mar;127(2):309-19.
doi: 10.1007/s00414-012-0764-9. Epub 2012 Sep 1.

Whole genome amplification of degraded and nondegraded DNA for forensic purposes

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Whole genome amplification of degraded and nondegraded DNA for forensic purposes

Agnieszka Maciejewska et al. Int J Legal Med. 2013 Mar.

Abstract

Degraded DNA is often analyzed in forensic genetics laboratories. Reliable analysis of degraded DNA is of great importance, since its results impact the quality and reliability of expert testimonies. Recently, a number of whole genome amplification (WGA) methods have been proposed as preamplification tools. They work on the premise of being able to generate microgram quantities of DNA from as little as the quantity of DNA from a single cell. We chose, investigated, and compared seven WGA methods to evaluate their ability to "recover" degraded and nondegraded DNA: degenerate oligonucleotide-primed PCR, primer extension preamplification PCR, GenomePlex™ WGA commercial kit (Sigma), multiple displacement amplification, GenomiPhi™ Amplification kit (Amersham Biosciences), restriction and circularization-aided rolling circle amplification, and blunt-end ligation-mediated WGA. The efficiency and reliability of those methods were analyzed and compared using SGMPlus, YFiler, mtDNA, and Y-chromosome SNP typing. The best results for nondegraded DNA were obtained with GenomiPhi and PEP methods. In the case of degraded DNA (200 bp), the best results were obtained with GenomePlex which successfully amplified also severely degraded DNA (100 bp), thus enabling correct typing of mtDNA and Y-SNP loci. WGA may be very useful in analysis of low copy number DNA or degraded DNA in forensic genetics, especially after introduction of some improvements (sample pooling and replicate DNA typing).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
SGMPlus profiles of triple PEP preamplifications of the same DNA extract and pooled products. PEP was run with 0.25 ng of template. Numbers indicate the percentage of successfully amplified alleles. a, b, c SGMPlus profiles of single, independent PEP reactions. d SGMPlus profile of pooled products
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Comparison of SGMPlus profiles of DNA obtained from male muscle tissue. a Nondegraded, native DNA; b DNA degraded to ca 200 bp; c, d, e degraded DNA preamplified by using GenomePlex amplification of 1, 10, and 100 ng, respectively. Asterisk indicates stutters (n-4 fraction)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Comparison of HVII regions of nondegraded mtDNA (a) and degraded mtDNA preamplified with GenomePlex (b). The box marks the presence of the A/G heteroplasmy

References

    1. Gill P, Whitaker J, Flaxman C, Brown N, Buckleton J. An investigation of the rigor of interpretation rules for STRs derived from less than 100 pg of DNA. Forensic Sci Int. 2000;112:17–40. doi: 10.1016/S0379-0738(00)00158-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Butler J. Fundamentals of forensic DNA typing. Gaithersburg: Academic; 2010.
    1. Sullivan KM, Hopgood R, Gill P. Identification of human remains by amplification and automate sequencing of mitochondrial DNA. Int J Legal Med. 1992;105:83–86. doi: 10.1007/BF02340829. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Levin BC, Cheng H, Reeder DJ. A human mitochondrial DNA standard reference material for quality control in forensic identification, medical diagnosis, and mutation detection. Genomics. 1999;55:135–146. doi: 10.1006/geno.1998.5513. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bender K, Schneider PM, Rittner C. Application of mtDNA sequence analysis in forensic casework for the identification of human remains. Forensic Sci Int. 2000;113:103–107. doi: 10.1016/S0379-0738(00)00223-1. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources