Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan;22(1):1-13.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2452-3. Epub 2012 Sep 2.

The optimal treatment of type II and III odontoid fractures in the elderly: a systematic review

Jeroen G J Huybregts  1 , Wilco C H Jacobs, Carmen L A M Vleggeert-Lankamp
Affiliations

The optimal treatment of type II and III odontoid fractures in the elderly: a systematic review

Jeroen G J Huybregts et al. Eur Spine J. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: Odontoid fractures are the most common cervical spine fractures in the elderly. As the population ages, their incidence is expected to increase progressively. The optimal treatment of this condition is still the subject of controversy. The objective of this review is to summarize and compare the outcome of surgical and conservative interventions in the elderly (≥ 65 years).

Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in nine databases of medical literature, supplemented by reference and citation tracking. Clinical status was considered the primary outcome. Fracture union and stability rates were considered secondary outcomes.

Results: A total of nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. All studies were performed retrospectively and were of limited quality. There was insufficient data, especially from direct comparisons, to determine the difference in clinical outcome between surgical and conservative interventions. Osseous union was achieved in 66-85 % of surgically treated patients and in 28-44 % of conservatively treated patients. Fracture stability was achieved in 82-97 % of surgically patients and in 53-79 % of conservatively treated patients.

Conclusions: There was insufficient data to determine a potential difference in clinical outcome between different treatment groups. Surgically treated patients showed higher osseous union rates compared to conservatively treated patients, possibly because of different selection mechanisms. The majority of patients appears to achieve fracture stability regardless of the applied treatment. A prospective trial with appropriate sample size is needed to identify the optimal treatment of odontoid fractures in the elderly and predictors for the success of either one of the available treatments.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart for inclusion of studies
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Anderson LD, D’Alonzo RT. Fractures of the odontoid process of the axis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56(8):1663–1674. - PubMed
    1. Andersson S, Rodrigues M, Olerud C. Odontoid fractures: high complication rate associated with anterior screw fixation in the elderly. Eur Spine J. 2000;9(1):56–59. doi: 10.1007/s005860050009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berlemann U, Schwarzenbach O. Dens fractures in the elderly: results of anterior screw fixation in 19 elderly patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 1997;68(4):319–324. doi: 10.3109/17453679708996169. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Borm W, Kast E, Richter HP, Mohr K. Anterior screw fixation in type II odontoid fractures: is there a difference in outcome between age groups? Neurosurgery. 2003;52(5):1089–1092. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000057697.62046.16. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Butler JS, Dolan RT, Burbridge M, et al. The long-term functional outcome of type II odontoid fractures managed non-operatively. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(10):1635–1642. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1391-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types