Value of audio-enhanced handheld computers over paper surveys with adolescents
- PMID: 22943102
- PMCID: PMC3834254
- DOI: 10.5993/AJHB.37.1.7
Value of audio-enhanced handheld computers over paper surveys with adolescents
Abstract
Objective: To examine the impact of 3 data collection modes on the number of questions answered, data quality, and student preference.
Methods: 275 urban seventh-grade students were recruited and randomly assigned to complete a paper survey (SAQ), PDA survey (PDA), or PDA survey with audio (APDA). Students completed a paper debriefing survey.
Results: APDA respondents completed significantly more questions compared to SAQ and PDA. PDA and APDA had significantly less missing data than did SAQ. No differences were found for student evaluation.
Conclusions: Strong benefits may be gained by the use of APDA for adolescent school-based data collection.
References
-
- Petersen AC, Leffert N. Developmental issues influencing guidelines for adolescent health research: a review. J Adolesc Health. 1995;17(5):298–305. - PubMed
-
- Resnick MD, Bearman PS, Blum RW, et al. Protecting adolescents from harm. JAMA. 1997;278(10):823. - PubMed
-
- Gans JE, Brindis CD. Choice of research setting in understanding adolescent health problems. J Adolesc Health. 1995;17(5):306–313. - PubMed
-
- Beebe TJ, Mika T, Harrison PA, et al. Computerized school surveys. Social Science Computer Review. 1997;15(2):159.
-
- Ellen JM, Gurvey JE, Pasch L, et al. A randomized comparison of A-CASI and phone interviews to assess STD/ HIV-related risk behaviors in teens. J Adolesc Health. 2002;31(1):26–30. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
