Single-dose and multi-dose delivery systems for intranasal fentanyl spray are bioequivalent as demonstrated in a replicate pharmacokinetic study
- PMID: 22943926
- DOI: 10.5414/CP201729
Single-dose and multi-dose delivery systems for intranasal fentanyl spray are bioequivalent as demonstrated in a replicate pharmacokinetic study
Abstract
Background: Intranasal fentanyl spray (INFS, Instanyl®) was developed to treat cancer patients with Breakthrough Pain (BTP). INFS is delivered via a multi-dose delivery system (MDS) that is available in various dose strengths. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of INFS single dose delivery system (SDS) in relation to the currently marketed MDS device.
Methods: In a randomized, single-center, single-dose, open label, comparative, four-period, two-sequence, replicate cross-over study, 48 healthy subjects (24 male and 24 female, mean age of 28.1 years, mean bodyweight 69.8 kg) received 200 μg/100 μl fentanyl administered via SDS and via MDS in one of two alternating treatment sequences. Naltrexone was given to all subjects to prevent potential fentanyl adverse drug reactions. Blood samples were frequently taken up to 72 hours post INFS administration and analyzed by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometric detection. Primary pharmacokinetic parameters were area under the curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞) and peak plasma concentration (Cmax). Statistical analyses of the primary pharmacokinetic parameters were performed using a linear mixed effect model applied to the natural log-transformed data.
Results: Healthy subjects showed very similar plasma concentration over time profiles for both delivery systems. The mean fentanyl Cmax and AUC0-∞ values for SDS and MDS were 948 pg/ml, 949 pg/ml and 4,439 pg×h/ml, 4,489 pg×h/ml. respectively. Point estimates (and 90% confidence intervals) for AUC and Cmax were 0.97 (0.93 - 1.02) and 1.00 (0.92 - 1.09) and therefore in the bioequivalence range of 0.80 - 1.25.
Conclusions: Results of this study show that SDS and MDS met the pre-defined regulatory criteria for bioequivalence. Safety profiles were consistent between both devices and no safety concerns were identified with INFS administered in combination with oral naltrexone.
Similar articles
-
An innovative phase I population pharmacokinetic approach to investigate the pharmacokinetics of an intranasal fentanyl spray in healthy subjects.Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Jun;51(6):495-508. doi: 10.5414/CP201867. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013. PMID: 23611571 Clinical Trial.
-
Faster absorption and higher systemic bioavailability of intranasal fentanyl spray compared to oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate in healthy subjects.Drug Deliv. 2013 Jun-Jul;20(5):216-23. doi: 10.3109/10717544.2012.762435. Epub 2013 May 8. Drug Deliv. 2013. PMID: 23650968 Clinical Trial.
-
Relative bioavailability of the fentanyl effervescent buccal tablet (FEBT) 1,080 pg versus oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate 1,600 pg and dose proportionality of FEBT 270 to 1,300 microg: a single-dose, randomized, open-label, three-period study in healthy adult volunteers.Clin Ther. 2006 May;28(5):715-24. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.05.016. Clin Ther. 2006. PMID: 16861093 Clinical Trial.
-
Intranasal fentanyl spray: a novel dosage form for the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain.Ann Pharmacother. 2012 Oct;46(10):1382-91. doi: 10.1345/aph.1R069. Epub 2012 Sep 25. Ann Pharmacother. 2012. PMID: 23012382 Review.
-
Fentanyl nasal spray for the treatment of cancer pain.Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2011 Jul;12(10):1653-9. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2011.585637. Epub 2011 May 24. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2011. PMID: 21609189 Review.
Cited by
-
Long-term efficacy and tolerability of intranasal fentanyl in the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain.Support Care Cancer. 2015 May;23(5):1349-54. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2491-x. Epub 2014 Oct 29. Support Care Cancer. 2015. PMID: 25351457
-
Rapid acting fentanyl formulations in breakthrough pain in cancer. Drug selection by means of the System of Objectified Judgement Analysis.Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2018 May;25(3):e2. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2016-001127. Epub 2017 Jan 11. Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2018. PMID: 29732145 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous