Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Sep 3:5:1-8.
doi: 10.3402/gha.v5i0.19281.

Strengthening standardised interpretation of verbal autopsy data: the new InterVA-4 tool

Affiliations

Strengthening standardised interpretation of verbal autopsy data: the new InterVA-4 tool

Peter Byass et al. Glob Health Action. .

Abstract

Background: Verbal autopsy (VA) is the only available approach for determining the cause of many deaths, where routine certification is not in place. Therefore, it is important to use standards and methods for VA that maximise efficiency, consistency and comparability. The World Health Organization (WHO) has led the development of the 2012 WHO VA instrument as a new standard, intended both as a research tool and for routine registration of deaths.

Objective: A new public-domain probabilistic model for interpreting VA data, InterVA-4, is described, which builds on previous versions and is aligned with the 2012 WHO VA instrument.

Design: The new model has been designed to use the VA input indicators defined in the 2012 WHO VA instrument and to deliver causes of death compatible with the International Classification of Diseases version 10 (ICD-10) categorised into 62 groups as defined in the 2012 WHO VA instrument. In addition, known shortcomings of previous InterVA models have been addressed in this revision, as well as integrating other work on maternal and perinatal deaths.

Results: The InterVA-4 model is presented here to facilitate its widespread use and to enable further field evaluation to take place. Results from a demonstration dataset from Agincourt, South Africa, show continuity of interpretation between InterVA-3 and InterVA-4, as well as differences reflecting specific issues addressed in the design and development of InterVA-4.

Conclusions: InterVA-4 is made freely available as a new standard model for interpreting VA data into causes of death. It can be used for determining cause of death both in research settings and for routine registration. Further validation opportunities will be explored. These developments in cause of death registration are likely to substantially increase the global coverage of cause-specific mortality data.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Byass P. A new era dawns for death registration. PLoS Speaking of Medicine. 2012. Aug 22, Available from: http://blogs.plos.org/speakingofmedicine/2012/08/22/a-new-era-dawns-for-... [cited 23 August 2012].
    1. Fottrell E, Byass P. Verbal Autopsy – methods in transition. Epidemiol Rev. 2010;32:38–55. - PubMed
    1. Lozano R, Lopez AD, Atkinson C, Naghavi M, Flaxman AD, Murray CJ, Population Health Metrics Research Consortium (PHMRC) Performance of physician-certified verbal autopsies: multisite validation study using clinical diagnostic gold standards. Popul Health Metr. 2011;9:32. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Montgomery AL, Morris SK, Bassani DG, Kumar R, Jotkar R, Jha P. Factors associated with physician agreement and coding choices of cause of death using verbal autopsies for 1130 maternal deaths in India. PLoS One. 2012;7:e33075. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Byass P, Kahn K, Fottrell E, Collinson MA, Tollman SM. Moving from data on deaths to public health policy in Agincourt, South Africa: approaches to analysing and understanding verbal autopsy findings. PLoS Med. 2010;7:e1000325. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types