Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Sep-Oct;60(5):416-22.
doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.100539.

Rapid assessment methods in eye care: an overview

Affiliations
Review

Rapid assessment methods in eye care: an overview

Srinivas Marmamula et al. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2012 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Reliable information is required for the planning and management of eye care services. While classical research methods provide reliable estimates, they are prohibitively expensive and resource intensive. Rapid assessment (RA) methods are indispensable tools in situations where data are needed quickly and where time- or cost-related factors prohibit the use of classical epidemiological surveys. These methods have been developed and field tested, and can be applied across almost the entire gamut of health care. The 1990s witnessed the emergence of RA methods in eye care for cataract, onchocerciasis, and trachoma and, more recently, the main causes of avoidable blindness and visual impairment. The important features of RA methods include the use of local resources, simplified sampling methodology, and a simple examination protocol/data collection method that can be performed by locally available personnel. The analysis is quick and easy to interpret. The entire process is inexpensive, so the survey may be repeated once every 5-10 years to assess the changing trends in disease burden. RA survey methods are typically linked with an intervention. This article provides an overview of the RA methods commonly used in eye care, and emphasizes the selection of appropriate methods based on the local need and context.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. MacIntyre K. Rapid assessment and sample surveys: Trade-offs in precision and cost. Health Policy Plan. 1999;14:363–73. - PubMed
    1. Macintyre K, Bilsborrow RE, Olmedo C, Carrasco R. Rapid surveys for program evaluation: Design and implementation of an experiment in Ecuador. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 1999;6:192–201. - PubMed
    1. Guha-Sapir D. Rapid assessment of health needs in mass emergencies: Review of current concepts and methods. World Health Stat Q. 1991;44:171–81. - PubMed
    1. Dineen B, Foster A, Faal H. A proposed rapid methodology to assess the prevalence and causes of blindness and visual impairment. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2006;13:31–4. - PubMed
    1. Marmamula S, Madala SR, Rao GN. Rapid Assessment of Visual Impairment (RAVI) in marine fishing communities in South India--study protocol and main findings. BMC Ophthalmol. 2011;11:26. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms