The inaccuracy of axillary temperatures measured with an electronic thermometer

Abstract

Temperatures were measured using an electronic thermometer in an emergency department to determine the relationship between oral or rectal and axillary measurements. A total of 164 data pairs were obtained--95 in afebrile children, and 69 in febrile children. The correlation coefficient was .74 for oral-axillary pairs, and .70 for rectal-axillary pairs. The mean difference between oral and axillary temperatures was 1.17 degrees C +/- 0.72 degrees C, and between rectal and axillary temperatures was 1.81 degrees C +/- 0.97 degrees C. Using 37.4 degrees C (greater than or equal to 2 SDs) axillary as the upper limit of normal, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for detecting a fever. The sensitivity was 46%; specificity, 99%; positive predictive value, 97%; and negative predictive value, 72% for combined oral-axillary and rectal-axillary data. It was concluded that axillary temperatures are not sensitive enough to determine a fever when measured with an electronic thermometer. Electronic thermometers should be used to determine oral or rectal temperatures; axillary temperatures may be misleading and should be abandoned in the outpatient setting.