Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Oct 19;287(43):36071-80.
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.390013. Epub 2012 Sep 4.

C-terminal domains of N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor modulate unitary channel conductance and gating

Affiliations

C-terminal domains of N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor modulate unitary channel conductance and gating

Bruce A Maki et al. J Biol Chem. .

Abstract

NMDA receptors (NRs) are glutamate-gated calcium-permeable channels that are essential for normal synaptic transmssion and contribute to neurodegeneration. Tetrameric proteins consist of two obligatory GluN1 (N1) and two GluN2 (N2) subunits, of which GluN2A (2A) and GluN2B (2B) are prevalent in adult brain. The intracellularly located C-terminal domains (CTDs) make a significant portion of mass of the receptors and are essential for plasticity and excitotoxicity, but their functions are incompletely defined. Recent evidence shows that truncation of the N2 CTD alters channel kinetics; however, the mechanism by which this occurs is unclear. Here we recorded activity from individual NRs lacking the CTDs of N1, 2A, or 2B and determined the gating mechanisms of these receptors. Receptors lacking the N1 CTDs had larger unitary conductance and faster deactivation kinetics, receptors lacking the 2A or 2B CTDs had longer openings and longer desensitized intervals, and the first 100 amino acids of the N2 CTD were essential for these changes. In addition, receptors lacking the CTDs of either 2A or 2B maintained isoform-specific kinetic differences and swapping CTDs between 2A and 2B had no effect on single-channel properties. Based on these results, we suggest that perturbations in the CTD can modify the NR-mediated signal in a subunit-dependent manner, in 2A these effects are most likely mediated by membrane-proximal residues, and the isoform-specific biophysical properties conferred by 2A and 2B are CTD-independent. The kinetic mechanisms we developed afford a quantitative approach to understanding how the intracellular domains of NR subunits can modulate the responses of the receptor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Schematic representation of NR subunits. A, scaled illustration of major functional domains and their respective relative sizes in N1 and N2 subunits. B, cartoon illustrating membrane topology and overall shape for each subunit. Indicated are truncations used in this study (red arrows) and putative phosphorylation sites (lines). NTD, N-terminal domain; LBD, ligand-binding domain.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
NR single-channel activity. Each panel illustrates a continuous 50-s portion of current recorded from a one-channel HEK293 attached patch expressing wild-type receptors (A) and CTD-truncated receptors (B–D). The Po values indicated in each panel were calculated for the entire file from which the segment was selected. Arrows point to isolated openings that occur only in receptors lacking N2 CTDs.
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
Current-voltage relationships of single NRs. Amplitudes of single-channel currents recorded from on-cell patches were measured at several applied voltages for receptors lacking the N1 CTD and for wild-type N1/2A and N1/2B. *, significant difference relative to the corresponding wild-type receptor; n = 5 for each condition (p < 0.05).
FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.
Open duration distributions of single NR channels. A and B, histograms of open durations detected in the entire records represented in Fig. 2. Overlaid are probability density functions (thick lines) and individual kinetic components (thin lines) calculated by fitting 5C4O models to each data file. Insets give the calculated time constants (τ) and areas (a) for each open component: Ef, ELow, EMed, and EHigh. C and D, summary bar graphs illustrate the relative changes in the duration of open components. *, statistically significant differences relative to wild type (p < 0.05).
FIGURE 5.
FIGURE 5.
Kinetic analyses of activation events. A and B, histograms of closed durations detected within bursts defined with τcrit (see “Experimental Procedures” and text). Overlaid are probability density functions (thick lines) and individual kinetic components (thin lines) calculated by fitting 3C4O models to each active file. Insets give the calculated time constants (τ) and areas (a) for each closed component: E1, E2, and E3. C, state models fitted to the events occurring within bursts in each record. The values on the arrows are the calculated averages, rounded to the first significant figure, for the respective rate constant (s−1). *, rates that were significantly faster (red) or slower (blue) relative to the corresponding wild-type receptor (p < 0.05). D, macroscopic responses to 10-ms applications of 1 mm glutamate were simulated with the models in C (left panel, absolute scale) or recorded experimentally from excised outside-out patches (right panel, normalized to peak current).
FIGURE 6.
FIGURE 6.
Kinetic analyses of desensitization events. A, histograms of closed durations for events that occurred outside of τcrit defined bursts (see “Experimental Procedures” and text) for WT receptors overlaid with the E4 and E5 components for WT (black lines) or CTD truncated (colored lines) receptors calculated by fitting 5C4O models to entire data files. Insets give the calculated time constants (τ) and areas (a) for the E4 and E5 closed components. B, summary of measured time constants and areas for E4 and E5. *, significant differences relative to wild type (p < 0.05). C, macroscopic responses to 5-s applications of 1 mm glutamate were simulated with the full kinetic models in supplemental Fig. S1 (top panel, absolute scale) or recorded experimentally from whole cells (bottom panel, normalized to peak).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Traynelis S. F., Wollmuth L. P., McBain C. J., Menniti F. S., Vance K. M., Ogden K. K., Hansen K. B., Yuan H., Myers S. J., Dingledine R. (2010) Glutamate receptor ion channels. Structure, regulation, and function. Pharmacol. Rev. 62, 405–496 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sobolevsky A. I., Rosconi M. P., Gouaux E. (2009) X-ray structure, symmetry and mechanism of an AMPA-subtype glutamate receptor. Nature 462, 745–756 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mayer M. L., Westbrook G. L., Guthrie P. B. (1984) Voltage-dependent block by Mg2+ of NMDA responses in spinal cord neurones. Nature 309, 261–263 - PubMed
    1. Nowak L., Bregestovski P., Ascher P., Herbet A., Prochiantz A. (1984) Magnesium gates glutamate-activated channels in mouse central neurones. Nature 307, 462–465 - PubMed
    1. Ascher P., Nowak L. (1988) The role of divalent cations in the N-methyl-d-aspartate responses of mouse central neurones in culture. J. Physiol. 399, 247–266 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances