Comments on the article by Araújo: are the criteria for peer review and publication clear?
- PMID: 22948304
- DOI: 10.1590/s0066-782x2012000700014
Comments on the article by Araújo: are the criteria for peer review and publication clear?
Comment on
-
Peer review: a constantly-evolving scientific process.Arq Bras Cardiol. 2012 Feb;98(2):e32-5. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2012000200017. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 22378341 Review. English, Portuguese, Spanish. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A how-to for peer review.Nature. 2011 May 5;473(7345):17. doi: 10.1038/473017a. Nature. 2011. PMID: 21544122 No abstract available.
-
Peer review: a constantly-evolving scientific process.Arq Bras Cardiol. 2012 Feb;98(2):e32-5. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2012000200017. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 22378341 Review. English, Portuguese, Spanish. No abstract available.
-
The Role of the Peer Reviewer.Acad Pediatr. 2017 Mar;17(2):105-106. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2016.08.011. Acad Pediatr. 2017. PMID: 28259333 No abstract available.
-
A commentary on the process of peer review and pathology data locking.Toxicol Pathol. 2010 Apr;38(3):508-10. doi: 10.1177/0192623310364024. Epub 2010 Mar 17. Toxicol Pathol. 2010. PMID: 20237370 No abstract available.
-
How to review a scientific paper.Asian J Psychiatr. 2014 Oct;11:124-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2014.08.007. Epub 2014 Aug 27. Asian J Psychiatr. 2014. PMID: 25248566 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources