Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1990 Jan;211(1):50-4.
doi: 10.1097/00000658-199001000-00008.

Increased morbidity in surgical patients undergoing secondary (incidental) cholecystectomy

Affiliations

Increased morbidity in surgical patients undergoing secondary (incidental) cholecystectomy

J D Green et al. Ann Surg. 1990 Jan.

Abstract

Using computerized hospital discharge abstracts for all Vermont residents hospitalized during 1983 and 1984, we examined the question of whether increased morbidity occurs in patients undergoing secondary (incidental) cholecystectomy. Among a cohort of 4183 patients undergoing a primary surgical procedure in which secondary cholecystectomy might have been considered. 69 patients had a secondary cholecystectomy. The surgical wound infection rate was 8.7% in the secondary cholecystectomy group compared to 2.4% in the rest of the cohort (relative risk, 3.7, 95% C.I. 1.7, 8.1). Other postoperative complications occurred in 10.1% of those undergoing secondary cholecystectomy compared to 4.1% in those who did not (relative risk, 2.5, 95% C.I. 1.2, 5.1). The adjusted relative risk for wound infection was 3.3 (95% C.I. 1.4,8.0) and for other surgical complications was 1.7 (95% C.I. 0.8, 3.8). Postoperative length of hospital stay was longer for the secondary cholecystectomy group (mean, 13.8 days) than in the comparison group (mean 8.9 days, p = 0.001). These data suggest that patients undergoing a secondary cholecystectomy may have an increased risk of surgical wound infection and possibly other surgical complications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. AMA Arch Surg. 1952 Apr;64(4):421-37 - PubMed
    1. Am J Surg. 1978 Feb;135(2):196-8 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 1948 Nov;128(5):931-7 - PubMed
    1. Digestion. 1986;33(4):189-97 - PubMed
    1. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982 Apr;154(4):557-60 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources