The use of Permacol® injections for the treatment of faecal incontinence
- PMID: 22948797
- DOI: 10.1007/s13304-012-0176-x
The use of Permacol® injections for the treatment of faecal incontinence
Abstract
The aim of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of Permacol(®) implant for the treatment of idiopathic faecal incontinence using a novel injection technique. Patients with idiopathic passive faecal incontinence were selected for trans-submucosal injection of Permacol(®) after assessment by anorectal physiology and endoanal ultrasonography. Clinical assessment and St. Mark's Incontinence Score were used to evaluate efficacy before and at two time points (1 and 2 years) after treatment. Rockwood Score were also used to determine quality of life before and after treatment. The Friedman and Chi-square tests were used to compare continuous and categorical data, respectively. A p value of <0.05 was deemed significant. Thirty-eight patients (24 female), median age 66 years, were recruited. At maximum clinical follow-up (median of 9 months), response to Permacol(®) injections was categorised as excellent, good, fair and poor in 12, 5, 4 and 17 patients, respectively. St. Mark's Score improved in 72 and 63 % of patients at 1 and 2 years, respectively. However, a smaller proportion of patients (39 and 27 %, respectively) achieved a 50 %, or more, improvement in Mark's Score. All four domains of Rockwood Quality of Life Score improved on first and second year follow-up, however, only two domains, coping and embarrassment, were statistically significant. Permacol(®) injection improved symptoms by >50 % in 39 and 27 % of patients on short and medium-term follow-ups, respectively. The trans-submucosal technique for injection of Permacol(®) in this study was safe with no significant adverse outcomes.
Similar articles
-
Sacral neuromodulation compared with injection of bulking agents for faecal incontinence following obstetric anal sphincter injury - a randomized controlled trial.Colorectal Dis. 2017 May;19(5):O134-O144. doi: 10.1111/codi.13632. Colorectal Dis. 2017. PMID: 28211186 Clinical Trial.
-
Pilot study of two new injectable bulking agents for the treatment of faecal incontinence.Colorectal Dis. 2008 Mar;10(3):268-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01318.x. Epub 2007 Jul 26. Colorectal Dis. 2008. PMID: 17655723 Clinical Trial.
-
Middle-term Outcomes of Gatekeeper Implantation for Fecal Incontinence.Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Apr;63(4):514-519. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001559. Dis Colon Rectum. 2020. PMID: 31985515
-
Multicentre observational study of the Gatekeeper for faecal incontinence.Br J Surg. 2016 Feb;103(3):290-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10050. Epub 2015 Dec 1. Br J Surg. 2016. PMID: 26621029 Free PMC article.
-
The SECCA procedure for faecal incontinence: a review.Colorectal Dis. 2014 Mar;16(3):167-72. doi: 10.1111/codi.12403. Colorectal Dis. 2014. PMID: 24034552 Review.
Cited by
-
Midterm outcomes of injectable bulking agents for fecal incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Mar;21(3):203-210. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1593-0. Epub 2017 Mar 1. Tech Coloproctol. 2017. PMID: 28251356
-
Safety and Efficacy of Permacol Injection in the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence.Ann Coloproctol. 2016 Apr;32(2):73-8. doi: 10.3393/ac.2016.32.2.73. Epub 2016 Apr 30. Ann Coloproctol. 2016. PMID: 27218098 Free PMC article.
-
An evaluation of the long-term effectiveness of Gatekeeper™ intersphincteric implants for passive faecal incontinence.Tech Coloproctol. 2022 Jul;26(7):537-543. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02630-z. Epub 2022 May 20. Tech Coloproctol. 2022. PMID: 35593969 Free PMC article.
-
Tools for fecal incontinence assessment: lessons for inflammatory bowel disease trials based on a systematic review.United European Gastroenterol J. 2020 Oct;8(8):886-922. doi: 10.1177/2050640620943699. Epub 2020 Jul 17. United European Gastroenterol J. 2020. PMID: 32677555 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources