Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Sep;22(3):280-92; quiz 293.
doi: 10.7182/pit2012890.

Prevention of poor psychosocial outcomes in living organ donors: from description to theory-driven intervention development and initial feasibility testing

Mary Amanda Dew  1 , Allan Zuckoff, Andrea F DiMartini, Annette J DeVito Dabbs, Mary L McNulty, Kristen R Fox, Galen E Switzer, Abhinav Humar, Henkie P Tan
Affiliations

Prevention of poor psychosocial outcomes in living organ donors: from description to theory-driven intervention development and initial feasibility testing

Mary Amanda Dew et al. Prog Transplant. 2012 Sep.

Abstract

Context: Although some living donors experience psychological, somatic, and interpersonal difficulties after donation, interventions to prevent such outcomes have not been developed or evaluated.

Objective: To (1) summarize empirical evidence on psychosocial outcomes after donation, (2) describe a theoretical framework to guide development of an intervention to prevent poor outcomes, and (3) describe development and initial evaluation of feasibility and acceptability of the intervention.

Methods: Based on a narrative literature review suggesting that individuals ambivalent about donation are at risk for poor psychosocial outcomes after donation, the intervention targeted this risk factor. Intervention structure and content drew on motivational interviewing principles in order to assist prospective donors to resolve ambivalence. Data were collected on donors' characteristics at our institution to determine whether they constituted a representative population in which to evaluate the intervention. Study participants were then recruited to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention. They were required to have scores greater than 0 on the Simmons Ambivalence Scale (indicating at least some ambivalence about donation).

Results: Our population was similar to the national living donor population on most demographic and donation-related characteristics. Eight individuals who had been approved to donate either a kidney or liver segment were enrolled for pilot testing of the intervention. All successfully completed the 2-session telephone-based intervention before scheduled donation surgery. Participants' ratings of acceptability and satisfaction were high. Open-ended comments indicated that the intervention addressed participants' thoughts and concerns about the decision to donate.

Conclusions: The intervention is feasible, acceptable, and appears relevant to donor concerns. A clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of the intervention is warranted.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. U.S. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) Data Tables. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Healthcare Systems Bureau, Division of Transplantation; Rockville, MD: United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS); Richmond, VA: University Renal Research and Education Association; Ann Arbor, MI: 2011. [Accessed November 3, 2011]. http://www.optn.transplant.hrsa.gov.
    1. U.S. OPTN and the SRTR. 2009 Annual Report, Transplant Data 1999–2008. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Healthcare Systems Bureau, Division of Transplantation; Rockville, MD: UNOS; Richmond, VA: University Renal Research and Education Association; Ann Arbor, MI: 2009. [Accessed November 3, 2011]. http:www.ustransplant.org/annual_report/current/default.htm.
    1. Davis CL. Living kidney donors: current state of affairs. Adv Chronic Kid Dis. 2009;16(4):242–249. - PubMed
    1. Jeon H, Lee SG. Living donor liver transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2010;15:283–287. - PubMed
    1. Lee SG. Living-donor liver transplantation in adults. Br Med Bull. 2010;94:33–48. - PubMed

Publication types