An inordinate fondness for eukaryotic diversity
- PMID: 22952431
- PMCID: PMC3429376
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001382
An inordinate fondness for eukaryotic diversity
Abstract
Why do some groups of organisms, like beetles, have so many species, and others, like the tuataras, so few? This classic question in evolutionary biology has a deep history and has been studied using both fossils and phylogenetic trees. Phylogeny-based studies have focused on tree balance, which compares the number of species across clades of the same age in the tree. These studies have suggested that rates of speciation and extinction vary tremendously across the tree of life. In this issue, Rabosky et al. report the most ambitious study to date on the differences in species diversity across clades in the tree of life. The authors bring together a tremendously large dataset of multicellular eukaryotes, including all living species of plants, animals, and fungi; they divide these organisms into 1,397 clades, accounting for more than 1.2 million species in total. Rabosky et al. find tremendous variation in diversity across the tree of life. There are old clades with few species, young clades with many species, and everything in between. They also note a peculiar aspect of their data: it is difficult or impossible to predict how many species will be found in a particular clade knowing how long a clade has been diversifying from a common ancestor. This pattern suggests complex dynamics of speciation and extinction in the history of eukaryotes. Rabosky et al.'s paper represents the latest development in our efforts to understand the Earth's biodiversity at the broadest scales.
Conflict of interest statement
The author has declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures


Comment on
-
Clade age and species richness are decoupled across the eukaryotic tree of life.PLoS Biol. 2012 Aug;10(8):e1001381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001381. Epub 2012 Aug 28. PLoS Biol. 2012. PMID: 22969411 Free PMC article.
Similar articles
-
Clade age and species richness are decoupled across the eukaryotic tree of life.PLoS Biol. 2012 Aug;10(8):e1001381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001381. Epub 2012 Aug 28. PLoS Biol. 2012. PMID: 22969411 Free PMC article.
-
Diversification rates and species richness across the Tree of Life.Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Sep 14;283(1838):20161334. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.1334. Proc Biol Sci. 2016. PMID: 27605507 Free PMC article.
-
Tree of life reveals clock-like speciation and diversification.Mol Biol Evol. 2015 Apr;32(4):835-45. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msv037. Epub 2015 Mar 3. Mol Biol Evol. 2015. PMID: 25739733 Free PMC article.
-
Predicting loss of evolutionary history: Where are we?Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017 Feb;92(1):271-291. doi: 10.1111/brv.12228. Epub 2015 Oct 14. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017. PMID: 26467982 Review.
-
Estimating diversification rates from phylogenetic information.Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 Nov;22(11):601-10. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.06.013. Epub 2007 Oct 25. Trends Ecol Evol. 2007. PMID: 17963995 Review.
Cited by
-
The significance of developmental robustness for species diversity.Ann Bot. 2016 Apr;117(5):725-32. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcw018. Epub 2016 Mar 18. Ann Bot. 2016. PMID: 26994100 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Gould SJ (1993) A special fondness for beetles. Nat Hist 102: 4–9.
-
- Townsend TM, Larson A, Louis E, Macey JR (2004) Molecular phylogenetics of squamata: the position of snakes, amphisbaenians, and dibamids, and the root of the squamate tree. Syst Biol 53: 735–757. - PubMed
-
- Hedges SB, Dudley J, Kumar S (2006) TimeTree: a public knowledge-base of divergence times among organisms. Bioinformatics 22: 2971–2972. - PubMed
-
- Liow LH (2007) Lineages with long durations are old and average: an analysis of multiple datasets. Evolution 61: 885–901. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous