Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Dec;13(14):1407-16.
doi: 10.4161/cbt.22001. Epub 2012 Sep 6.

Preliminary pharmacology of galactosylated chitosan/5-fluorouracil nanoparticles and its inhibition of hepatocellular carcinoma in mice

Affiliations

Preliminary pharmacology of galactosylated chitosan/5-fluorouracil nanoparticles and its inhibition of hepatocellular carcinoma in mice

Mingrong Cheng et al. Cancer Biol Ther. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

Biodegradable polymer nanoparticle drug delivery systems are characterized by targeted drug delivery, improved pharmacokinetic and biodistribution, enhanced drug stability and lowered side effects; these drug delivery systems are widely used for delivery of cytotoxic agents. The galactosylated chitosan (GC)/5-fluorouracil (5-FU) nanoparticle is a nanomaterial made by coupling GC, a polymer known to have the advantages described above, and 5-FU. The GC/5-FU nanoparticle is a sustained release system, it was showed that the peak time, half-life time, mean residence time (MRT) and area of under curve (AUC) of GC/5-FU were longer or more than those of the 5-FU group, but the maximum concentration (Cmax) was lower. The distribution of GC/5-FU in vivo revealed the greatest accumulation in the hepatic cancer tissues, and the hepatic cell was the target of the nanoparticles. Toxicology research showed that the toxicity of GC-5-FU was lower than that of 5-FU in mice. In vivo experiments showed that GC/5-FU can significantly inhibit tumor growth in an orthotropic liver cancer mouse model. GC/5-FU treatment can significantly lower the tumor weight and increase the survival time of mice when compared with 5-FU treatment alone. Flow cytometry and the TUNEL assay revealed that compared with 5-FU, GC/5-FU caused higher rates of G 0-G 1 arrest and apoptosis in hepatic cancer cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Figure 2. Particle size and scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of GC/5-FU. (A) Particle size graph showing the diameter of GC/5-FU (35.19 ± 9.50 nm). (B) SEM image of GC/5-FU. The particles show spherical structure with a smooth surface and no adhesion between nanoparticles.
None
Figure 3. The in vitro release curve of nanoparticles in simulated body fluid (37°C, pH 7.4, n = 3). A rapid release was observed from time 0 to 12 h, with a cumulative release percentage of 32.4%; a smooth slow-release occurred between days 1 and 8, with a cumulative release percentage of 93.50%. During days 8 to 10, the release reached a plateau, with a cumulative release percentage of 95.70% at day 10.
None
Figure 4. Concentration-time curves of 5-FU and GC/5-FU from 5 min to 48 h in mice after tail vein injection (n = 150). The Cmax of 5-FU group appeared within 5 min, and then the concentration stepped down quickly. The concentration was near 0 after 4–6 h. The concentration of GC/5-FU was slowly increased and reached to the Cmax of it about 2 h, then the concentration stepped down slowly and maintained within 30–60 h. GC/5-FU group’s Cmax of 5-FU in plasma were lower than the 5-FU group, but the half-life time was obviously longer than that of 5-FU group.
None
Figure 5. Model mice and normal mice were treated with i.v. 5-FU or GC/5-FU, 5-FU concentration in different tissues was determined 30 min post-injection; results were shown as an average ± standard deviation (n = 5). (A) 5-FU concentration in different tissues in normal mice. The 5-FU concentration in the liver in GC/5-FU group was significantly higher (over 1.5-fold) than that in 5-FU group. (B) 5-FU concentration in different tissues in model normal mice. The 5-FU concentration of liver and liver cancer tissue in GC/5-FU group was increased significantly than that in 5-FU group, the 5-FU concentration of liver cancer tissue in GC/5-FU group was over 2-fold in 5-FU group.
None
Figure 6. The curative effect of GC/5-FU on liver cancer in the orthotopic transplant model of hepatocellular carcinoma. (A) 5 d after the tumor was established, GC/5-FU, 5-FU, GC or PBS was given to the mice. Tumor weight was measured at day 10. (B)Treatment was given as described previously and the survival was monitored. The median survival for control, GC, 5-FU and GC/5-FU groups were 12, 13, 17 and 30 d, respectively. Compared with control or GC group, **p < 0.01; compared with 5-FU group, ##p < 0.01.
None
Figure 7. The effects of different treatments on cell cycle, proliferation index and apoptosis index. (A) Flow cytometry analysis of cell cycle distribution of H22 cells. (B) Quantification of cell cycle distribution and proliferation index of H22 cells. Percentage of cells in G0-G1 in the GC/5-FU and 5-FU groups was higher than that in control and GC groups, while the proliferation index decreased significantly (p < 0.01). (C) Quantification of apoptosis of H22 in different treatment groups. Compared with control or GC group, **p < 0.01; compared with 5-FU group, ##p < 0.01.
None
Figure 8. in situ apoptosis detected by TUNEL assay. Few apoptotic cells can be detected in control or GC groups; scattered distributed apoptotic cells can be observed in the 5-FU-treated group and massive clustered apoptotic cells were seen in the GC/5-FU group.
None
Figure 9. Bar graph showing quantification of the apoptotic index (AI) in hepatic cancer tissues with different treatments. AI increased from control to GC to 5-FU to GC/5-FU (p < 0.01). Compared with control or GC group, **p < 0.01; compared with 5-FU group, #p < 0.05.
None
Figure 1. Establishment of the hepatic cancer mouse model. (A) Liver cancer; (B) normal mouse liver.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kim NH, Kim SN, Oh JS, Lee S, Kim YK. Anti-mitotic potential of 7-diethylamino-3(2′-benzoxazolyl)-coumarin in 5-fluorouracil-resistant human gastric cancer cell line SNU620/5-FU. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012;418:616–21. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.01.049. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hsieh CH, Liu CY, Hsieh YJ, Tai HC, Wang LY, Tsai TH, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-8 mediates the unfavorable systemic impact of local irradiation on pharmacokinetics of anti-cancer drug 5-Fluorouracil. PLoS One. 2011;6:e21000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021000. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Namikawa T, Fukudome I, Kitagawa H, Okabayashi T, Kobayashi M, Hanazaki K. Plasma diamine oxidase activity is a useful biomarker for evaluating gastrointestinal tract toxicities during chemotherapy with oral fluorouracil anti-cancer drugs in patients with gastric cancer. Oncology. 2012;82:147–52. doi: 10.1159/000336799. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sakata Y, Komatsu Y, Takagi S, Saitoh S, Itoh T, Suzuki H, et al. Randomized controlled study of mitomycin C/carboquone/5-fluorouracil/OK-432 (MQ-F-OK) therapy and mitomycin C/5-fluorouracil/doxorubicin (FAM) therapy against advanced liver cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1989;23(Suppl):S9–12. doi: 10.1007/BF00647230. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kanetaka K, Enjoji A, Furui J, Nagata Y, Fujioka H, Shiogama T, et al. The Nagasaki Study Group for Digestive Organ Cancer Chemotherapy Effects of Intermittent 5-Fluorouracil and Low-dose Cisplatin Therapy on Advanced and Recurrent Gastric Cancer. Anticancer Res. 2012;32:3495–9. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources