Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan;471(1):169-74.
doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2573-3.

Patient-specific total knee arthroplasty required frequent surgeon-directed changes

Affiliations

Patient-specific total knee arthroplasty required frequent surgeon-directed changes

Benjamin M Stronach et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Patient-specific instrumentation potentially improves surgical precision and decreases operative time in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) but there is little supporting data to confirm this presumption.

Questions/purposes: We asked whether patient-specific instrumentation would require infrequent intraoperative changes to replicate a single surgeon's preferences during TKA and whether patient-specific instrumentation guides would fit securely.

Methods: We prospectively evaluated the plan and surgery in 60 patients treated with 66 TKAs performed with patient-specific instrumentation and recorded any changes. A subset of six postoperative radiographic changes to the femoral and tibial components (implant size, coronal and sagittal alignment) was analyzed to determine if surgeon intervention was beneficial. Each guide was evaluated to determine fit. We compared patient demographics and implant sizing in the patient-specific instrumentation group with a control group in which traditional instrumentation was used.

Results: We recorded 161 intraoperative changes in 66 knee arthroplasties (2.4 changes/knee) performed with patient-specific instrumentation. The predetermined implant size was changed intraoperatively in 77% of femurs and 53% of tibias. We identified a subset of 95 intraoperative changes that could be radiographically evaluated to determine if our changes were an improvement or detriment to reaching goal alignment. Eighty-two of the 95 changes (86%) made by the surgeon were an improvement to the recommended alignment or size of patient-specific instrumentation. The guide did not fit securely on eight femurs (12%) and three tibias (5%). Tourniquet time and blood loss were not improved with patient-specific instrumentation.

Conclusions: We caution surgeons against blind acceptance of patient-specific instrumentation technology without supportive data.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
This screenshot shows an example of the preoperative templating software allowing changes to the implants and resections in a virtual format before guide manufacturing.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The total number of patient-specific instrumentation knees is listed with the number of knees requiring changes provided.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ecker ML, Lotke PA, Windsor RE, Cella JP. Long-term results after total condylar knee arthroplasty. Significance of radiolucent lines. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;216:151–158. - PubMed
    1. Fehring TK, Odum SM, Troyer JL, Iorio R, Kurtz SM, Lau EC. Joint replacement access in 2016: a supply side crisis. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:1175–1181. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.07.025. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hariri S, York SC, O’Connor MI, Parsley BS, McCarthy JC. A resident survey study of orthopedic fellowship specialty decision making and views on arthroplasty as a career. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:961–968. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.09.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Howell SM, Kuznik K, Hull ML, Siston RA. Results of an initial experience with custom-fit positioning total knee arthroplasty in a series of 48 patients. Orthopedics. 2008;31:857–863. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20080901-15. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Klatt BA, Goyal N, Austin MS, Hozack WJ. Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty (OtisKnee) results in malalignment. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:26–29. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.10.001. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms