Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 May 30;1(1):20.
doi: 10.1186/2047-2994-1-20.

Mortality and Clostridium difficile infection: a review

Affiliations

Mortality and Clostridium difficile infection: a review

Brett G Mitchell et al. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. .

Abstract

Background: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a common cause of diarrhoea in hospitalised patients. Around the world, the incidence and severity of CDI appears to be increasing, particularly in the northern hemisphere. The purpose of this integrative review was to investigate and describe mortality in hospitalised patients with CDI.

Methods: A search of the literature between 1 January 2005 and 30 April 2011 focusing on mortality and CDI in hospitalised patients was conducted using electronic databases. Papers were reviewed and analysed individually and themes were combined using integrative methods.

Results: All cause mortality at 30 days varied from 9% to 38%. Three studies report attributable mortality at 30 days, varying from 5.7% to 6.9%. In hospital mortality ranged from 8% to 37.2%

Conclusion: All cause 30 day mortality appeared to be high, with 15 studies indicating a mortality of 15% or greater. Findings support the notion that CDI is a serious infection and measures to prevent and control CDI are needed. Future studies investigating the mortality of CDI in settings outside of Europe and North America are needed. Similarly, future studies should include data on patient co-morbidities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of search strategy. Notes.1 Articles were excluded if they were not case controlled, cohort or reviews or did not examine mortality in hospitalised patients. 2 Articles were excluded if they did not examine mortality at fixed intervals.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McDonald LC, Coignard B, Dubberke E, Song X, Horan T, Kutty PK. Ad Hoc Clostridium difficile Surveillance Working G. Recommendations for surveillance of Clostridium difficile-associated disease. Infect Contr Hosp Epidemiol. 2007;28:140–145. doi: 10.1086/511798. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stuart R, Marshall C. Clostridium difficile infection: a new threat on our doorstep. Med J Aust. 2011;194:331–332. - PubMed
    1. Van Gessel H, Riley T, McGregor A. Clostridium difficile infection: an update for infection control practitioners. Healthc Infect. 2009;14:115–118. doi: 10.1071/HI09105. - DOI
    1. Heinlen L, Ballard JD. Clostridium difficile infection. Am J Med Sci. 2010;340:247–252. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e3181e939d8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khanna S, Pardi DS. The growing incidence and severity of Clostridium difficile infection in inpatient and outpatient settings. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;4:409–416. doi: 10.1586/egh.10.48. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources