Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Oct;23(9-10):600-10.
doi: 10.1007/s00335-012-9418-y. Epub 2012 Sep 9.

Mouse large-scale phenotyping initiatives: overview of the European Mouse Disease Clinic (EUMODIC) and of the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute Mouse Genetics Project

Affiliations
Review

Mouse large-scale phenotyping initiatives: overview of the European Mouse Disease Clinic (EUMODIC) and of the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute Mouse Genetics Project

Abdel Ayadi et al. Mamm Genome. 2012 Oct.

Abstract

Two large-scale phenotyping efforts, the European Mouse Disease Clinic (EUMODIC) and the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute Mouse Genetics Project (SANGER-MGP), started during the late 2000s with the aim to deliver a comprehensive assessment of phenotypes or to screen for robust indicators of diseases in mouse mutants. They both took advantage of available mouse mutant lines but predominantly of the embryonic stem (ES) cells resources derived from the European Conditional Mouse Mutagenesis programme (EUCOMM) and the Knockout Mouse Project (KOMP) to produce and study 799 mouse models that were systematically analysed with a comprehensive set of physiological and behavioural paradigms. They captured more than 400 variables and an additional panel of metadata describing the conditions of the tests. All the data are now available through EuroPhenome database (www.europhenome.org) and the WTSI mouse portal (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/mouseportal/), and the corresponding mouse lines are available through the European Mouse Mutant Archive (EMMA), the International Knockout Mouse Consortium (IKMC), or the Knockout Mouse Project (KOMP) Repository. Overall conclusions from both studies converged, with at least one phenotype scored in at least 80% of the mutant lines. In addition, 57% of the lines were viable, 13% subviable, 30% embryonic lethal, and 7% displayed fertility impairments. These efforts provide an important underpinning for a future global programme that will undertake the complete functional annotation of the mammalian genome in the mouse model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart for ES cells injection and mouse breeding strategies for cohort production. Targeted ES cells were injected to generate chimeric animals. After germline transmission of the mutant allele, the heterozygous mice were bred for pedigree expansion, archiving, distribution, and cohort production. Depending on the fertility score, heterozygous or homozygous matings were used to generate cohorts of animals for mouse phenotyping
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schematic overview of the EUMODIC and MGP pipelines. The Sanger MGP pipeline started at the age of 4 weeks and ended at 16 weeks of age, whereas the EUMODIC programme encompasses two pipelines, 1 and 2, which started at 9 weeks and were completed after 7 and 6 weeks, respectively. The phenotyping platforms used in these pipelines are indicated

References

    1. Austin C, Battey J, Bradley A, Bucan M, Capecchi M, Collins F, Dove W, Duyk G, Dymecki S, Eppig J, Grieder F, Heintz N, Hicks G, Insel T, Joyner A, Koller B, Lloyd K, Magnuson T, Moore M, Nagy A, Pollock J, Roses A, Sands A, Seed B, Skarnes W, Snoddy J, Soriano P, Stewart D, Stewart F, Stillman B, Varmus H, Varticovski L, Verma I, Vogt T, von Melchner H, Witkowski J, Woychik R, Wurst W, Yancopoulos G, Young S, Zambrowicz B. The knockout mouse project. Nat Genet. 2004;36:921–924. doi: 10.1038/ng0904-921. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Auwerx J, Avner P, Baldock R, Ballabio A, Balling R, Barbacid M, Berns A, Bradley A, Brown S, Carmeliet P, Chambon P, Cox R, Davidson D, Davies K, Duboule D, Forejt J, Granucci F, Hastie N, de Angelis M, Jackson I, Kioussis D, Kollias G, Lathrop M, Lendahl U, Malumbres M, von Melchner H, Müller W, Partanen J, Ricciardi-Castagnoli P, Rigby P, Rosen B, Rosenthal N, Skarnes B, Stewart A, Thornton J, Tocchini-Valentini G, Wagner E, Wahli W, Wurst W. The European dimension for the mouse genome mutagenesis program. Nat Genet. 2004;36:925–927. doi: 10.1038/ng0904-925. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Birling M, Gofflot F, Warot X. Site-specific recombinases for manipulation of the mouse genome. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;561:245–263. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-019-9_16. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Birling MC, Dierich A, Jacquot S, Hérault Y, Pavlovic G. Highly-efficient, fluorescent, locus directed Cre and flpo deleter mice on a pure C57BL/6 N genetic background. Genesis. 2011;50:482–489. doi: 10.1002/dvg.20826. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boles MK, Wilkinson BM, Maxwell A, Lai L, Mills AA, Nishijima I, Salinger AP, Moskowitz I, Hirschi KK, Liu B, Bradley A, Justice MJ. A mouse chromosome 4 balancer ENU-mutagenesis screen isolates eleven lethal lines. BMC Genet. 2009;10:12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-10-12. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources