Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Nov 15;72(22):5692-701.
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-2309. Epub 2012 Sep 7.

DNA methylation biomarkers offer improved diagnostic efficiency in lung cancer

Affiliations

DNA methylation biomarkers offer improved diagnostic efficiency in lung cancer

Georgios Nikolaidis et al. Cancer Res. .

Abstract

The exceptional high mortality of lung cancer can be instigated to a high degree by late diagnosis. Despite the plethora of studies on potential molecular biomarkers for lung cancer diagnosis, very few have reached clinical implementation. In this study, we developed a panel of DNA methylation biomarkers and validated their diagnostic efficiency in bronchial washings from a large retrospective cohort. Candidate targets from previous high-throughput approaches were examined by pyrosequencing in an independent set of 48 lung tumor/normal paired. Ten promoters were selected and quantitative methylation-specific PCR (qMSP) assays were developed and used to screen 655 bronchial washings from the Liverpool Lung Project (LLP) subjects divided into training (194 cases and 214 controls) and validation (139 cases and 109 controls) sets. Three statistical models were used to select the optimal panel of markers and to evaluate the performance of the discriminatory algorithms. The final logit regression model incorporated hypermethylation at p16, TERT, WT1, and RASSF1. The performance of this 4-gene methylation signature in the validation set showed 82% sensitivity and 91% specificity. In comparison, cytology alone in this set provided 43% sensitivity at 100% specificity. The diagnostic efficiency of the panel did not show any biases with age, gender, smoking, and the presence of a nonlung neoplasm. However, sensitivity was predictably higher in central (squamous and small cell) than peripheral (adenocarcinomas) tumors, as well as in stage 2 or greater tumors. These findings clearly show the impact of DNA methylation-based assays in the diagnosis of cytologically occult lung neoplasms. A prospective trial is currently imminent in the LLP study to provide data on the enhancement of diagnostic accuracy in a clinical setting, including by additional markers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Outline of the study progress phases. The distribution of candidate biomarker (BM) targets is validated for by Pyrosequencing Methylation analysis (PMA) in an independent set of lung cancer tissues. Quantitative methylation-specific PCR (qMSP) assays are developed and evaluated for their robustness in clinical samples. These are used to screen the training bronchial washings (BW) set from lung cancer patients and age/sex matched controls. Samples were excluded if extracted DNA failed in quality control. Statistical modeling demonstrates six markers with higher discriminating efficiency and these are used to screen the validation BW set. Further statistical modeling is applied to test the derived algorithms in the validation set. The qualifying 4-marker panel incorporates cytological data in order to construct the final algorithm. UAT: Univariate Association Test, BSR: Best Subset Regression, MDR: Multifactor Dimensionality Reduction.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sensitivities of cytology and DNA methylation in different pathological stages of lung cancer. DNA methylation demonstrates superior sensitivity across all stages. D: DNA methylation panel, C: cytology.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60:277–300. - PubMed
    1. Jack RH, Davies EA, Moller H. Lung cancer incidence and survival in different ethnic groups in South East England. Br J Cancer. 2011;105:1049–53. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mulshine JL, van Klaveren RJ. Lung cancer screening: what is the benefit and what do we do about it? Lung Cancer. 2011;71:247–8. - PubMed
    1. Van’t Westeinde SC, van Klaveren RJ. Screening and early detection of lung cancer. Cancer J. 2011;17:3–10. - PubMed
    1. Dobler CC, Crawford AB. Bronchoscopic diagnosis of endoscopically visible lung malignancies: should cytologic examinations be performed routinely? Intern Med J. 2009 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms