Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Sep 15;28(18):i389-i394.
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts396.

Uncovering the co-evolutionary network among prokaryotic genes

Affiliations

Uncovering the co-evolutionary network among prokaryotic genes

Ofir Cohen et al. Bioinformatics. .

Abstract

Motivation: Correlated events of gains and losses enable inference of co-evolution relations. The reconstruction of the co-evolutionary interactions network in prokaryotic species may elucidate functional associations among genes.

Results: We developed a novel probabilistic methodology for the detection of co-evolutionary interactions between pairs of genes. Using this method we inferred the co-evolutionary network among 4593 Clusters of Orthologous Genes (COGs). The number of co-evolutionary interactions substantially differed among COGs. Over 40% were found to co-evolve with at least one partner. We partitioned the network of co-evolutionary relations into clusters and uncovered multiple modular assemblies of genes with clearly defined functions. Finally, we measured the extent to which co-evolutionary relations coincide with other cellular relations such as genomic proximity, gene fusion propensity, co-expression, protein-protein interactions and metabolic connections. Our results show that co-evolutionary relations only partially overlap with these other types of networks. Our results suggest that the inferred co-evolutionary network in prokaryotes is highly informative towards revealing functional relations among genes, often showing signals that cannot be extracted from other network types.

Availability and implementation: Available under GPL license as open source.

Contact: talp@post.tau.ac.il.

Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Methodology outline. Given an input of phyletic pattern and a phylogenetic tree, we detect correlated evolutionary histories and use simulations to infer significant co-evolving genes
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Degree distribution of the co-evolutionary network on a log–log scale. All 4,593 COGs are ranked according to their degree. In total, 1,940 COGs have at least one connection.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
The flagellum-related cluster. This cluster contains 30 highly connected COGs (the nodes in the figure), all flagellar-related and is the biggest cluster of co-evolutionary genes
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Functional modules of co-evolving genes that include an uncharacterized member. (A) ‘Mu-like prophage’ cluster (B) ‘Type IV secretory pathway’ cluster. Yellow nodes correspond to COGs that are uncharacterized

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ashkenazy H., Kliger Y. Reducing phylogenetic bias in correlated mutation analysis. Prot. Eng. Des. Sel. 2010;23:321–326. - PubMed
    1. Barabasi A.L., Oltvai Z.N. Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2004;5:101–113. - PubMed
    1. Barker D., et al. Constrained models of evolution lead to improved prediction of functional linkage from correlated gain and loss of genes. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:14–20. - PubMed
    1. Batagelj V., Mrvar A. Pajek - analysis and visualization of large networks. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2002;2265:477–478.
    1. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R Stat. Soc. B. 1995;57:289–300.

Publication types