Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus
- PMID: 2296291
- DOI: 10.1038/343066a0
Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus
Abstract
The sensory bases of species and population mate preferences are well known; in frogs properties of the female auditory system influence such preferences. By contrast, there is little understanding of how sensory characteristics could result in sexual selection within a population. One possible mechanism is that females are more sensitive to male courtship signals that deviate from the population mean. We document this mechanism in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus. Female basilar papilla tuning is biased toward lower-than-average frequencies in the 'chuck' portion of the male's call, explaining female preference for the lower-frequency chucks produced by larger males. The tuning does not differ between P. pustulosus and its close relative P. coloradorum, a species in which males never evolved the ability to produce chucks; thus the female tuning evolved before the chuck and therefore the chuck played no role in the evolution of the preference. This allows us to reject two popular hypotheses for the evolution of this female preference (runaway sexual selection and natural selection) in favour of a third: sexual selection for sensory exploitation.
Comment in
-
Evolution. A case of male opportunism.Nature. 1990 Jan 4;343(6253):20. doi: 10.1038/343020a0. Nature. 1990. PMID: 2296285 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Animal communication: complex call production in the túngara frog.Nature. 2006 May 4;441(7089):38. doi: 10.1038/441038a. Nature. 2006. PMID: 16672962
-
Evolution of calls and auditory tuning in the Physalaemus pustulosus species group.Brain Behav Evol. 2001;58(3):137-51. doi: 10.1159/000047268. Brain Behav Evol. 2001. PMID: 11910171
-
The development of sexual behavior in túngara frogs (Physalaemus pustulosus).J Comp Psychol. 2010 Feb;124(1):66-80. doi: 10.1037/a0017227. J Comp Psychol. 2010. PMID: 20175598
-
Vocal communication in frogs.Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004 Dec;14(6):751-7. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2004.10.015. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004. PMID: 15582379 Review.
-
An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2008 May;83(2):151-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00037.x. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2008. PMID: 18429767 Review.
Cited by
-
A COGNITIVE PERSPECTIVE ON AGGRESSIVE MIMICRY.J Zool (1987). 2013 Jul 1;290(3):161-171. doi: 10.1111/jzo.12036. J Zool (1987). 2013. PMID: 23976823 Free PMC article.
-
Humans are not fooled by size illusions in attractiveness judgements.Evol Hum Behav. 2014 Mar;35(2):133-139. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.11.007. Evol Hum Behav. 2014. PMID: 24719551 Free PMC article.
-
Avian psychology and communication.Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Jul 22;271(1547):1435-42. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2753. Proc Biol Sci. 2004. PMID: 15306314 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Signal efficacy and the evolution of male dimorphism in the jumping spider, Maevia inclemens.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Dec 15;90(24):11954-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.24.11954. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993. PMID: 11607446 Free PMC article.
-
Vestigial preference functions in neural networks and túngara frogs.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Nov 6;98(23):13161-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.231296998. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001. PMID: 11698682 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous