Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Dec;80(6):1021-33.
doi: 10.1037/a0029932. Epub 2012 Sep 10.

A comparison of cognitive bias modification for interpretation and computerized cognitive behavior therapy: effects on anxiety, depression, attentional control, and interpretive bias

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Randomized Controlled Trial

A comparison of cognitive bias modification for interpretation and computerized cognitive behavior therapy: effects on anxiety, depression, attentional control, and interpretive bias

Jennifer O Bowler et al. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012 Dec.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Objective: Computerized cognitive behavioral therapy (cCBT) and cognitive bias modification for interpretation (CBM-I) both have demonstrated efficacy in alleviating social anxiety, but how they compare with each other has not been investigated. The present study tested the prediction that both interventions would reduce anxiety relative to a no-intervention comparison condition, but CBM-I would be particularly effective at modifying threat-related cognitive bias under high mental load.

Method: Sixty-three primarily Caucasian adults (mean age = 22.7, SD = 5.87; 68.3% female) with high social anxiety, randomly allocated to 3 groups: CBM-I (n = 21), cCBT (n = 21), and a no-intervention control group (n = 21) provided complete data for analysis. Pre- and postintervention (4 sessions lasting 2 weeks, control participants only attended the pre-post sessions) self-report measures of anxiety, depression, attentional control, and threat-related interpretive bias were completed. In addition, interpretive bias under high versus low cognitive load was measured using the Scrambled Sentences Test.

Results: Both CBM-I and cCBT groups reported significantly reduced levels of social anxiety, trait anxiety, and depression and improved attentional control, relative to the control group, with no clear superiority of either active intervention. Although both active conditions reduced negative bias on the Scrambled Sentences Test completed under mental load, CBM-I was significantly more effective at doing so.

Conclusions: The results suggest that although not differing in therapeutic efficacy, CBM-I and cCBT might differ in the resilience of their effects when under mental load.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) diagram illustrating flow of participants through the study. CBM-I = cognitive bias modification for interpretation; cCBT = computer-aided version of cognitive behavioral therapy.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Mean difference scores (pre- minus postintervention) for the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale (FNE), Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN), Trait scale of the Spielberger State–Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Beck Depression Inventory–II (BDI-II), and Attentional Control Scale (ACS; post- minus preintervention) by group (a higher score indicates greater improvement in anxiety, depression, and attentional control). Error bars represent ± 1 standard error. CBM-I = cognitive bias modification for interpretation; cCBT = computer-aided version of cognitive behavioral therapy.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Mean difference scores (pre- minus postintervention) for the Scrambled Sentences Test (SST) by group (a more positive score indicates a greater reduction in the proportion of negative resolutions generated). Error bars represent ± 1 standard error. CBM-I = cognitive bias modification for interpretation; cCBT = computer-aided version of cognitive behavioral therapy.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
    1. Amir N., Beard C., Taylor L. T., Klumpp H., Elias J., Burns M., & Chen X. (2009). Attention training in individuals with generalized social phobia: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 961–973. doi:10.1037/a0016685 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amir N., Bomyea J., & Beard C. (2010). The effect of a single-session interpretation modification on attention bias in socially anxious individuals. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 24, 178–182. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.10.005 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amir N., & Taylor C. T. (2012a). Combining computerized home-based treatments for generalized anxiety disorder: An attention modification program and cognitive behavioral therapy. Behavior Therapy, 43, 546–559. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2010.12.008 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amir N., & Taylor C. T. (2012b). Interpretation training in individuals with generalized social anxiety disorder: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 80, 497–511. doi:10.1037/a0026928 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types