Evaluation of new bone formation in normal and osteoporotic rats with a 3-mm femur defect: functional assessment with dynamic PET-CT (dPET-CT) using 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-D-glucose ( (18)F-FDG) and (18)F-fluoride
- PMID: 22965489
- DOI: 10.1007/s11307-012-0592-9
Evaluation of new bone formation in normal and osteoporotic rats with a 3-mm femur defect: functional assessment with dynamic PET-CT (dPET-CT) using 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-D-glucose ( (18)F-FDG) and (18)F-fluoride
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the current study was to assess the formation of new bone in a 3-mm created defect in the femur and its adjacent bone tissue in osteoporotic and normal animals. The assessment is based on bone remodeling and glucose metabolism in a rat model with a 3-mm created defct in the femur using (18)F-fluoride and 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG) as tracers for dynamic PET-CT (dPET-CT). The (18)F-fluoride PET data were compared with those of (18)F-FDG.
Procedures: Osteoporosis was induced by ovariectomy and a calcium restricted diet in each rat (n = 7). Alternatively, a sham operation was performed in the control group (n = 8). After 3 months, all rats were operated to create a 3-mm defect using an oscillating saw in the distal metaphyseal femur, which was internally fixed with a metal plate. Eighteen weeks after osteoporosis induction and 6 weeks following femoral surgery, dPET-CT studies scan were performed with (18)F-FDG and (18)F-fluoride. Following PET data acquisition, standardized uptake values (SUVs) were calculated from the tracer concentration values. Then, a two-tissue compartmental learning-machine model was applied to the data for the calculation of the compartment parameters (K1-k4, VB, Ki). Furthermore, a non-compartmental model based on the fractal dimension was applied for quantitative analysis of both groups and both tracers. Finally, multivariate analysis was performed for the statistical analysis of the kinetic data.
Results: The values for K1 and Ki were higher in the osteoporotic rats than in the control group. Ki and K1 of (18)F-fluoride in the adjacent bone tissue differ significantly based on the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for the osteoporotic and control group (p < 0.05). The sensitivity and the negative predictive value (NPV) based on linear discriminant analysis was high with a value of 100 % for both tracers and both evaluated regions (defect and adjacent bone tissue) when comparing control and osteoporotic rats. The overall accuracy with (18)F-FDG was generally higher than that with (18)F-fluoride for both evaluated regions for the control and osteoporotic rats based on a multiparameter evaluation.
Conclusion: In this study, the changes in tracer kinetics accurately discriminated differences in the created defect in the femur and its adjacent bone tissue between osteoporotic and control rats.
Similar articles
-
Preliminary evaluation of different biomaterials for defect healing in an experimental osteoporotic rat model with dynamic PET-CT (dPET-CT) using F-18-sodium fluoride (NaF).Injury. 2014 Mar;45(3):501-5. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.11.023. Epub 2013 Nov 28. Injury. 2014. PMID: 24332163
-
Application of F-18-sodium fluoride (NaF) dynamic PET-CT (dPET-CT) for defect healing: a comparison of biomaterials in an experimental osteoporotic rat model.Med Sci Monit. 2014 Oct 15;20:1942-9. doi: 10.12659/MSM.891073. Med Sci Monit. 2014. PMID: 25317537 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of bone remodeling with (18)F-fluoride and correlation with the glucose metabolism measured by (18)F-FDG in lumbar spine with time in an experimental nude rat model with osteoporosis using dynamic PET-CT.Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;3(2):118-28. Epub 2013 Mar 8. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013. PMID: 23526138 Free PMC article.
-
Quantitative approaches of dynamic FDG-PET and PET/CT studies (dPET/CT) for the evaluation of oncological patients.Cancer Imaging. 2012 Sep 28;12(1):283-9. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2012.0033. Cancer Imaging. 2012. PMID: 23033440 Free PMC article. Review.
-
PET/CT for the Opportunistic Screening of Osteoporosis and Fractures in Cancer Patients.Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2024 Dec;22(6):553-560. doi: 10.1007/s11914-024-00887-x. Epub 2024 Sep 14. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2024. PMID: 39276167 Review.
Cited by
-
Quantitative imaging methods in osteoporosis.Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2016 Dec;6(6):680-698. doi: 10.21037/qims.2016.12.13. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2016. PMID: 28090446 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effects of P-15 Peptide Coated Hydroxyapatite on Tibial Defect Repair In Vivo in Normal and Osteoporotic Rats.Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:253858. doi: 10.1155/2015/253858. Epub 2015 Oct 5. Biomed Res Int. 2015. PMID: 26509146 Free PMC article.
-
Quantitative analysis of 18F-NaF dynamic PET/CT cannot differentiate malignant from benign lesions in multiple myeloma.Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Sep 1;7(4):148-156. eCollection 2017. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017. PMID: 28913153 Free PMC article.
-
A novel decellularized matrix of Wnt signaling-activated osteocytes accelerates the repair of critical-sized parietal bone defects with osteoclastogenesis, angiogenesis, and neurogenesis.Bioact Mater. 2022 Aug 16;21:110-128. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.07.017. eCollection 2023 Mar. Bioact Mater. 2022. PMID: 36093329 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring a Nitric Oxide-Releasing Celecoxib Derivative as a Potential Modulator of Bone Healing: Insights from Ex Vivo and In Vivo Imaging Experiments.Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Mar 13;26(6):2582. doi: 10.3390/ijms26062582. Int J Mol Sci. 2025. PMID: 40141223 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical