Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan;19(1):59-68.
doi: 10.1002/lt.23547.

Declining liver utilization for transplantation in the United States and the impact of donation after cardiac death

Affiliations

Declining liver utilization for transplantation in the United States and the impact of donation after cardiac death

Eric S Orman et al. Liver Transpl. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Worsening donor liver quality resulting in decreased organ utilization may be contributing to the recent decline in liver transplants nationally. We sought to examine trends in donor liver utilization and the relationship between donor characteristics and nonuse. We used the United Network for Organ Sharing database to review all deceased adult organ donors in the United States from whom at least 1 solid organ was transplanted into a recipient. Trends in donor characteristics were examined. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between donor characteristics and liver nonuse between 2004 and 2010. Population attributable risk proportions were determined for donor factors associated with nonuse. We analyzed 107,259 organ donors. The number of unused livers decreased steadily from 1958 (66% of donors) in 1988 to 841 (15%) in 2004 but then gradually increased to 1345 (21%) in 2010. The donor age, the body mass index (BMI), and the prevalence of diabetes and donation after cardiac death (DCD) all increased over time, and all 4 factors were independently associated with liver nonuse. DCD had the highest adjusted odds ratio (OR) for nonuse, and the odds increased nearly 4-fold between 2004 [OR = 5.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 4.57-6.70] and 2010 (OR = 21.31, 95% CI = 18.30-24.81). The proportion of nonuse attributable to DCD increased from 9% in 2004 to 28% in 2010. In conclusion, the proportion of donor livers not used has increased since 2004. Older donor age, greater BMI, diabetes, and DCD are all independently associated with nonuse and are on the rise nationally. Current trends may lead to significant declines in liver transplant availability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Temporal trends in (A) age, (B) BMI, (C) diabetes, and (D) hypertension expressed as percentages among donors of at least one solid organ.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Temporal trends in (A) age, (B) BMI, (C) diabetes, and (D) hypertension expressed as percentages among donors of at least one solid organ.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Temporal trends in (A) age, (B) BMI, (C) diabetes, and (D) hypertension expressed as percentages among donors of at least one solid organ.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Temporal trends in (A) age, (B) BMI, (C) diabetes, and (D) hypertension expressed as percentages among donors of at least one solid organ.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Trends in donation after cardiac death and liver non-use, 1995–2010. The bars denote the absolute numbers of donors who had at least one solid organ transplanted, according to donation after cardiac death (DCD) versus donation after brain death (DBD) (left axis). The line denotes the percentage of liver grafts unused among those donors who donated at least one organ (right axis).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Temporal trends in liver non-use across UNOS regions among donors of at least one solid organ. Region 9 is depicted with a bold black line, compared to the other 10 regions in gray.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Percentage of overall liver graft non-use among donors of at least one solid organ due to donation after cardiac death, by year. These values are calculated as the population attributable risk proportions, based on the adjusted odds ratios for non-use and annual prevalence of DCD.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wertheim JA, Petrowsky H, Saab S, Kupiec-Weglinski JW, Busuttil RW. Major challenges limiting liver transplantation in the United States. Am J Transplant. 2011;11(9):1773–84. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spitzer AL, Lao OB, Dick AA, Bakthavatsalam R, Halldorson JB, Yeh MM, et al. The biopsied donor liver: incorporating macrosteatosis into high-risk donor assessment. Liver Transpl. 2010;16(7):874–84. - PubMed
    1. McCormack L, Petrowsky H, Jochum W, Mullhaupt B, Weber M, Clavien PA. Use of severely steatotic grafts in liver transplantation: a matched case-control study. Ann Surg. 2007;246(6):940–6. discussion 6–8. - PubMed
    1. Foley DP, Fernandez LA, Leverson G, Chin LT, Krieger N, Cooper JT, et al. Donation after cardiac death: the University of Wisconsin experience with liver transplantation. Ann Surg. 2005;242(5):724–31. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Feng S, Goodrich NP, Bragg-Gresham JL, Dykstra DM, Punch JD, DebRoy MA, et al. Characteristics associated with liver graft failure: the concept of a donor risk index. Am J Transplant. 2006;6(4):783–90. - PubMed

Publication types