Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Sep-Oct;10(5):443-51.
doi: 10.1370/afm.1378.

Validation of a generic measure of continuity of care: when patients encounter several clinicians

Jeannie L Haggerty  1 , Danièle Roberge, George K Freeman, Christine Beaulieu, Mylaine Bréton
Affiliations

Validation of a generic measure of continuity of care: when patients encounter several clinicians

Jeannie L Haggerty et al. Ann Fam Med. 2012 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: Patients who regularly see more than one clinician for health problems risk discontinuity and fragmented care. Our objective was to develop and validate a generic measure of management continuity from the patient perspective.

Methods: Themes from 33 qualitative studies of patient experience with care from various clinicians were matched to existing instruments to identify potential measures and measurement gaps. Adapted and new items were tested cognitively, and the instrument was administered to 376 adult patients consulting in primary care for a variety of health conditions but seeing clinicians in a variety of settings. After initial psychometric analysis, the instrument was modified slightly and readministered after 6 months. The analysis identified reliable subscales and their association with indicators of continuity.

Results: Observed factors correspond to 8 intended constructs, with good reliability. Three subscales (12 items) relate to the principal clinician and cover management and relational continuity. Four subscales (13 items) are related to multiple clinicians and address team relational continuity and problems with coordination and gaps in information transfer. Two (11 items) pertain to the patient's partnership in care. Subscales correlate well and in expected directions with indicators of discontinuity (wanting to change clinicians, suffering, and sense of being abandoned, medical errors) and degree of care organization.

Conclusion: The instrument reliably assesses both positive and negative dimensions of continuity of care across the entire system, and the subscales correlate with continuity effects. It supports patient-centered and relationship-based care and can be used as a whole or in part to assess coordination and continuity in primary care.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Haggerty JL, Reid RJ, Freeman GK, Starfield BH, Adair CE, McKendry R. Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. BMJ. 2003; 327(7425):1219–1221 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Haggerty R, Jr, McGrail K, McKendry R. Here, There, And All Over The Place: Defining And Measuring Continuity of Health Care (Appendix D). Health Policy Research Unit Research Reports: Centre for Health Services and Policy Research. The University Of British Columbia; 2001:59
    1. McClellan WM, Hall WD, Brogan D, Miles C, Wilber JA. Continuity of care in hypertension. An important correlate of blood pressure control among aware hypertensives. Arch Intern Med. 1988;148(3): 525–528 - PubMed
    1. Anderson MA, Helms LB. Communication between continuing care organizations. Res Nurs Health. 1995;18(1):49–57 - PubMed
    1. Hadjistavropoulos H, Biem H, Sharpe D, Bourgault-Fagnou M, Janzen J. Patient perceptions of hospital discharge: Reliability and validity of a patient continuity of care questionnaire. Intl J Qual Health Care/ISQua. 2008;20(5):314–23 - PubMed

Publication types