Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jan;1(1):127-132.
doi: 10.3892/ol_00000023. Epub 2010 Jan 1.

T regulatory cell markers in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Relationship with survival and tumor aggressiveness

Affiliations

T regulatory cell markers in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Relationship with survival and tumor aggressiveness

Geane Moreira et al. Oncol Lett. 2010 Jan.

Abstract

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are a heterogeneous cell family which plays an important role in tumor-associated immune response. Of these, T regulatory (Treg) cells have also been shown to inhibit anti-tumor response. We aimed to evaluate the expression of T regulatory cell markers (CD4, CD25, CTLA-4 and FoxP3) in samples of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) and lip SCC (LSCC) by immunohistochemistry. The relationship of Treg markers with survival data and the proliferative index were also evaluated. We observed similar numbers of CD4-, CD25- and FoxP3(+) cells in OCSCC and LSCC. On the other hand, numbers of CTLA-4(+) cells were significantly lower in OCSCC than in LSCC. OCSCC samples with high numbers of CD4 exhibited a high proliferative index, while samples with high CTLA-4 counts demonstrated a low tumoral proliferative index. A log-rank test showed that patients with OCSCC that presented high counts of CD4 showed a significantly decreased survival compared with patients with low cell counts. In contrast, high CD25(+) cell counts were associated with increased survival. Our results suggest an association of CD4 with poor prognosis, while CD25 expression is related with favorable prognosis. These findings result from the heterogeneity of TIL subsets that display an antagonistic role in tumor immune cell response.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Densities of (A) CD4+, (B) CD25+, (C) CTLA-4+ and (D) FoxP3+ cells in primary oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) (n=18) and lip squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) (n=8). The percentage of positive cells was calculated as the proportion of the total of inflammatory cells. Results are expressed as the mean of positive cells ± SD. *Indicates a significant difference, when comparing metastatic OCSCC and LSCC, P<0.05.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Densities of (A) CD4+, (B) CD25+, (C) CTLA-4+ and (D) FoxP3+ cells in primary oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) (n=18) and lip squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) (n=8). The percentage of positive cells was calculated as the proportion of the total of inflammatory cells. Results are expressed as the mean of positive cells ± SD. *Indicates a significant difference, when comparing metastatic OCSCC and LSCC, P<0.05.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Densities of (A) CD4+, (B) CD25+, (C) CTLA-4+ and (D) FoxP3+ cells in primary oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) (n=18) and lip squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) (n=8). The percentage of positive cells was calculated as the proportion of the total of inflammatory cells. Results are expressed as the mean of positive cells ± SD. *Indicates a significant difference, when comparing metastatic OCSCC and LSCC, P<0.05.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Densities of (A) CD4+, (B) CD25+, (C) CTLA-4+ and (D) FoxP3+ cells in primary oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) (n=18) and lip squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) (n=8). The percentage of positive cells was calculated as the proportion of the total of inflammatory cells. Results are expressed as the mean of positive cells ± SD. *Indicates a significant difference, when comparing metastatic OCSCC and LSCC, P<0.05.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relationship between the proliferative index and densities of (A) CD4, (B) CD25, (C) CTLA-4 and (D) FoxP3 in OCSCC (n=18). The values of CD4, CD25, CTLA-4 and FoxP3 were dichotomized into high and low groups using the median values. The proliferative index of the tumor was determined by evaluating the number of cells showing Ki67 staining as a proportion of the total epithelial cell population. The results are expressed as the mean of positive cells ± SD. *Indicates a significant difference, when comparing high and low groups; P<0.05.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relationship between the proliferative index and densities of (A) CD4, (B) CD25, (C) CTLA-4 and (D) FoxP3 in OCSCC (n=18). The values of CD4, CD25, CTLA-4 and FoxP3 were dichotomized into high and low groups using the median values. The proliferative index of the tumor was determined by evaluating the number of cells showing Ki67 staining as a proportion of the total epithelial cell population. The results are expressed as the mean of positive cells ± SD. *Indicates a significant difference, when comparing high and low groups; P<0.05.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relationship between the proliferative index and densities of (A) CD4, (B) CD25, (C) CTLA-4 and (D) FoxP3 in OCSCC (n=18). The values of CD4, CD25, CTLA-4 and FoxP3 were dichotomized into high and low groups using the median values. The proliferative index of the tumor was determined by evaluating the number of cells showing Ki67 staining as a proportion of the total epithelial cell population. The results are expressed as the mean of positive cells ± SD. *Indicates a significant difference, when comparing high and low groups; P<0.05.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relationship between the proliferative index and densities of (A) CD4, (B) CD25, (C) CTLA-4 and (D) FoxP3 in OCSCC (n=18). The values of CD4, CD25, CTLA-4 and FoxP3 were dichotomized into high and low groups using the median values. The proliferative index of the tumor was determined by evaluating the number of cells showing Ki67 staining as a proportion of the total epithelial cell population. The results are expressed as the mean of positive cells ± SD. *Indicates a significant difference, when comparing high and low groups; P<0.05.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier survival curves according to the density status of (A) CD4 and (B) CD25 in primary OCSCC. CD4+ and CD25+ cell numbers were dichotomized by median values (high groups, n=9; low groups, n=9).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier survival curves according to the density status of (A) CD4 and (B) CD25 in primary OCSCC. CD4+ and CD25+ cell numbers were dichotomized by median values (high groups, n=9; low groups, n=9).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hanahan D, Lanzavecchia A, Mihich E. Fourteenth Annual Pezcoller Symposium: the novel dichotomy of immune interactions with tumors. Cancer Res. 2003;63:3005–3008. - PubMed
    1. Oliveira-Neto HH, Leite AF, Costa NL, et al. Decrease in mast cells in oral squamous cell carcinoma: possible failure in the migration of these cells. Oral Oncol. 2007;43:484–490. - PubMed
    1. Akbar AN, Taams LS, Salmon M, Vukmanovic-Stejic M. The peripheral generation of CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells. Immunology. 2003;109:319–325. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang HY, Lee DA, Peng G, et al. Tumor-specific human CD4+ regulatory T cells and their ligands: implications for immunotherapy. Immunity. 2004;20:107–118. - PubMed
    1. Wei WZ, Morris GP, Kong YC. Anti-tumor immunity and autoimmunity: a balancing act of regulatory T cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2004;53:73–78. - PMC - PubMed