Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012:2:646.
doi: 10.1038/srep00646. Epub 2012 Sep 10.

Evolution of cooperation driven by zealots

Affiliations

Evolution of cooperation driven by zealots

Naoki Masuda. Sci Rep. 2012.

Abstract

Recent experimental results with humans involved in social dilemma games suggest that cooperation may be a contagious phenomenon and that the selection pressure operating on evolutionary dynamics (i.e., mimicry) is relatively weak. I propose an evolutionary dynamics model that links these experimental findings and evolution of cooperation. By assuming a small fraction of (imperfect) zealous cooperators, I show that a large fraction of cooperation emerges in evolutionary dynamics of social dilemma games. Even if defection is more lucrative than cooperation for most individuals, they often mimic cooperation of fellows unless the selection pressure is very strong. Then, zealous cooperators can transform the population to be even fully cooperative under standard evolutionary dynamics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Fraction of cooperators among the ordinary players in the presence of perfectly zealous cooperators (i.e., p = 1).
The lines represent T = 1 + y/w. I used a typical payoff matrix of the prisoner's dilemma game given by R = 1, T > 1, and S = P = 0. I set (a) w = 0.1 and (b) w = 1.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Fraction of cooperators among the ordinary players as a function of the additional density of zealous players (i.e., y) and the probability of unconditional cooperation for zealous players (i.e., p).
I set R = 1 and S = P = 0. (a) w = 0.1, T = 1.5. (b) w = 0.1, T = 2.5. (c) w = 1, T = 1.5. (d) w = 1, T = 2.5.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Fraction of cooperators among the ordinary players in the prisoner's dilemma game when the pairwise comparison rule is used for the updating.
I set R = 1, S = P = 0, and formula image. (a) T = 1.5. (b) T = 2.5.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Fraction of cooperators among the ordinary players as a function of the temptation payoff (i.e., T ).
I set R = 1 and S = P = 0. (a) w = 0.1. (b) w = 1.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Fraction of cooperators among the ordinary players as a function of y and p in the snowdrift game.
I set R = β − 0.5, S = β − 1, T = β, P = 0, and β = 0.5. (a) w = 0.1. (b) w = 1.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nowak M. A. Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 314, 1560–1563 (2006). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nowak M. A. Evolutionary Dynamics (The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, MA, 2006).
    1. Fowler J. H. & Christakis N. A. Cooperative behavior cascades in human social networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 5334–5338 (2010). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yamagishi T. & Cook K. S. Generalized exchange and social dilemmas. Social Psychology Quarterly 56, 235–248 (1993).
    1. Molm L. D., Collett J. L. & Schaefer D. R. Building solidarity through generalized exchange: a theory of reciprocity. Am. J. Sociol. 113, 205–242 (2007).

Publication types