Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun;16(3):394-400.
doi: 10.1111/cid.12002. Epub 2012 Sep 11.

Resonance frequency analysis assessment of implants placed with a simultaneous or a delayed approach in grafted and nongrafted sinus sites: a 12-month clinical study

Affiliations

Resonance frequency analysis assessment of implants placed with a simultaneous or a delayed approach in grafted and nongrafted sinus sites: a 12-month clinical study

Sergio Di Lallo et al. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Implant stability is one of the key factors for a successful osseointegration. At present, several techniques are available to regenerate bone tissue, but it is not clear whether implants placed in grafted bone are as stable as implants in native bone over time.

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to compare, by means of resonance frequency analysis (RFA), the stability of implants placed in sinus-grafted and -nongrafted sites during 12-month follow-up.

Methods: Twenty-five patients received a total of 38 implants. Nineteen implants were placed in maxillary native bone (group A) and 19 implants following maxillary sinus floor augmentation using anorganic bovine bone and autogenous bone (group B) in a 50:50 ratio. Group B was divided into groups B1 and B2 depending on the timing of implant insertion, that is, B1 simultaneously and B2 6 months after sinus lift. The implants were inserted according to a two-stage procedure. RFA values were collected at baseline, 6 and 12 months after implant placement.

Results: Between the tested groups, no statistically significant difference was found in RFA values of implants placed in sinus-grafted and -nongrafted sites after the surgery as well as at 6 and 12 months, while a significant difference was recorded in group B1 (p = .0297) when RFA values were compared over time.

Conclusions: The results of the present study suggest that regenerated bone can offer good stability for dental implants.

Keywords: bone regeneration; dental implants; implant stability; maxillary sinus augmentation; resonance frequency analysis (RFA).

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Substances

LinkOut - more resources