Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Dec;13(4):1230-5.
doi: 10.1208/s12249-012-9851-y. Epub 2012 Sep 12.

Miniaturized transfer models to predict the precipitation of poorly soluble weak bases upon entry into the small intestine

Affiliations

Miniaturized transfer models to predict the precipitation of poorly soluble weak bases upon entry into the small intestine

Sandra Klein et al. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

For poorly soluble weak bases, the possibility of drug precipitation upon entry into the small intestine may affect the amount of drug available for uptake through the intestinal mucosa. A few years ago, a transfer model was introduced which has been developed to simulate the transfer of a dissolved drug out of the stomach into the small intestine. However, this setup requires the use of clinically relevant doses of the drug, which are typically not available in the early stages of formulation development. The present series of tests was performed to check whether it is possible to create a miniaturized but physiologically relevant transfer model that can be applied in the early formulation development. Experiments were performed with two miniaturized setups: a 96-well plate model and a mini-paddle transfer system. Itraconazole and tamoxifen were used as model drugs. An appropriate amount of each drug formulation was dissolved in simulated gastric fluid and then transferred into an acceptor phase consisting of fasted/fed state simulated small intestinal fluid. The amount of drug dissolved in the acceptor phase was monitored over a period of 4 h. Results from both setups were very similar. The tamoxifen preformulation did not precipitate, whereas the itraconazole formulation precipitated to the same extent in both setups. Due to the possibility of generating physiologically relevant results but using smaller sample sizes and smaller volumes of media, both miniaturized transfer systems offer various advantages in terms of substance and analytical and material cost savings when evaluating the precipitation potential of poorly soluble weakly basic drug candidates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Experimental setup for the 96-well plate transfer experiments (donor phase transfer)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Experimental setup for the mini-paddle transfer experiments
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Precipitation behavior (entire profile (left panel); detailed view (right panel)) of itraconazole in the 96-well plate transfer model in the simulated fasted (orange) and fed (blue) state, mean of 24 ± SD. The gray line indicates the theoretical drug concentration
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Precipitation behavior (entire profile (left panel); detailed view (right panel)) of itraconazole in the mini-paddle transfer model after adding the gastric drug solution at the same time (square) or with a transfer rate of 2 mL/min (triangle) in the simulated fasted (orange) and fed (blue) state, mean of 3 ± SD. The gray line indicates the theoretical drug concentration
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Precipitation behavior (entire profile (left panel); detailed view (right panel)) of tamoxifen in the 96-well plate transfer model in the simulated fasted (orange) and fed (blue) state, mean of 24 ± SD. The gray line indicates the theoretical drug concentration
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Precipitation behavior (entire profile (left panel); detailed view (right panel)) of tamoxifen in the mini-paddle transfer model after adding the gastric drug solution at the same time (square) or with a transfer rate of 2 mL/min (triangle) in the simulated fasted (orange) and fed (blue) state, mean of 3 ± SD. The gray line indicates the theoretical drug concentration

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dai WG. In vitro methods to assess drug precipitation. Int J Pharm. 2010;393(1–2):1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.03.040. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dai WG, Pollock-Dove C, Dong LC, Li S. Advanced screening assays to rapidly identify solubility-enhancing formulations: high-throughput, miniaturization and automation. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60:657–672. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2007.10.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heikkila T, Karjalainen M, Ojala K, Partola K, Lammert F, Augustijns P, et al. Equilibrium drug solubility measurements in 96-well plates reveal similar drug solubilities in phosphate buffer pH 6.8 and human intestinal fluid. Int J Pharm. 2011;405:132–136. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.12.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kerns EH, Di L. Pharmaceutical profiling in drug discovery. Drug Discov Today. 2003;8(7):316–323. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6446(03)02649-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buchanan NL, Buchanan CM. High throughput screening method for determination of equilibrium drug solubility. In: Edgar KJ, Heinze T, Buchanan CM, editors. Polysaccharide materials: performance by design. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society; 2009. pp. 65–80.

LinkOut - more resources