Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Dec;30(10):811-8.
doi: 10.1007/s11604-012-0125-0. Epub 2012 Sep 4.

Magnetic resonance imaging predictors of surgical outcome in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis

Affiliations

Magnetic resonance imaging predictors of surgical outcome in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis

Banu Alicioglu et al. Jpn J Radiol. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: To identify any MRI predictors for surgical outcomes of patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) having instrumented posterior decompression (IPD) surgery.

Materials and methods: Seventy patients with DLSS who underwent IPD were reviewed retrospectively. The clinical score of each patient was assessed using the JOAS (Japanese Orthopedics Association Scoring) system, which is mainly based on the subjective symptoms and physical signs of the patients before (JOAS-I) and after (JOAS-II) surgery. Healing rate (HR) was calculated as: [(JOAS-II) - (JOAS-I)] × 100/[15 - (JOAS-I)]. HR >50 % was considered clinical improvement. Radiological stenosis was assessed on MRI and was graded from 0 to 3 at the laminectomy level in terms of thecal sac-nerve root compression, foraminal stenosis, and facet degeneration.

Results: Mean HR of the improved patients (n = 39) was 81.94; HR of the unimproved patients (n = 31) was 34.75 (p < 0.05). There was no statistical difference in radiological stenosis parameters between the two groups (p > 0.05). HR was worse in patients with severe facet degeneration.

Conclusions: Surgical outcomes of DLSS depend on multiple variables. It is not possible to predict the outcomes by assessing only one parameter. The possible outcomes should be analyzed by considering all the factors individually.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991 Jun;16(6):615-9 - PubMed
    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976 Mar-Apr;(115):96-100 - PubMed
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Jun 1;25(11):1424-35; discussion 1435-6 - PubMed
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Jun 15;19(12):1335-8 - PubMed
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Jun 1;32(13):1423-8; discussion 1429 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources