Evaluation of clinical threshold policies for cataract surgery among English commissioners
- PMID: 22969092
- DOI: 10.1258/jhsrp.2012.012023
Evaluation of clinical threshold policies for cataract surgery among English commissioners
Abstract
Objectives: To ascertain if access to cataract surgery is being restricted in England and to describe any explicit threshold criteria.
Methods: A survey of 151 local commissioners to explore their cataract surgery policy. A literature review identified research evidence about thresholds for cataract surgery. A checklist was devised and applied to the policies supplied by commissioners.
Results: Almost half (71/151) of commissioners were restricting access to surgery and this included patients with some capacity to benefit. There was wide variation in the scope and content of the 67 policies which were available for review. Almost all (92%) commissioners use criteria that do not reflect guidance or research evidence.
Conclusions: Patients who could benefit from cataract surgery are being excluded by some commissioners. Variations in policy between commissioners results in inequalities in access.
The Royal Society of Medicine Press Ltd 2012
Similar articles
-
The cataract surgery access debate: why variation may be a good thing.Eye (Lond). 2016 Mar;30(3):331-2. doi: 10.1038/eye.2015.272. Epub 2016 Jan 22. Eye (Lond). 2016. PMID: 26795409 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Commissioning processes in primary care trusts: a repeated cross-sectional survey of health care commissioners in England.J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012 Jan;17 Suppl 1:31-9. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.010191. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012. PMID: 22315475
-
Implementing world class commissioning competencies.J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012 Jan;17 Suppl 1:40-8. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.011104. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012. PMID: 22315476
-
A review of prison health and its implications for primary care nursing in England and Wales: the research evidence.J Clin Nurs. 2007 Jul;16(7):1201-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01799.x. J Clin Nurs. 2007. PMID: 17584337 Review.
-
Consequences of waiting for cataract surgery.Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2011 Jan;22(1):28-30. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e328341425d. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2011. PMID: 21076306 Review.
Cited by
-
'Cosmetic boob jobs' or evidence-based breast surgery: an interpretive policy analysis of the rationing of 'low value' treatments in the English National Health Service.BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 20;14:413. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-413. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014. PMID: 25240484 Free PMC article.
-
Variations in policies for accessing elective musculoskeletal procedures in the English National Health Service: A documentary analysis.J Health Serv Res Policy. 2022 Jul;27(3):190-202. doi: 10.1177/13558196221091518. Epub 2022 May 15. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2022. PMID: 35574682 Free PMC article.
-
Should Countries Set an Explicit Health Benefits Package? The Case of the English National Health Service.Value Health. 2017 Jan;20(1):60-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.01.004. Value Health. 2017. PMID: 28212971 Free PMC article.
-
The Royal College of Ophthalmologists' Cataract Surgery Commissioning Guidance: executive summary.Eye (Lond). 2016 Mar;30(3):498-502. doi: 10.1038/eye.2015.271. Epub 2016 Jan 22. Eye (Lond). 2016. PMID: 26795408 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The cataract surgery access debate: why variation may be a good thing.Eye (Lond). 2016 Mar;30(3):331-2. doi: 10.1038/eye.2015.272. Epub 2016 Jan 22. Eye (Lond). 2016. PMID: 26795409 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources