The importance of being relevant
- PMID: 22969739
- PMCID: PMC3430883
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00309
The importance of being relevant
Abstract
This review aims at an understanding of the binding process by synthesizing the extant perspectives regarding binding. It begins with a consideration of the biological explanations of binding, viz., conjunctive coding, synchrony, and reentrant mechanisms. Thereafter binding is reviewed as a psychological process guided by top-down signals. The stages and types of binding proposed by various researchers are discussed in this section. The next section introduces Working Memory (WM) as the executive directing the top-down signals. After that it is described how WM works by selecting relevant sensory input, followed by a detailed consideration of the debate regarding objects vs. features with the conclusion that relevance is the key factor determining what is processed. The next section considers other factors affecting the selection of relevant input. Then, we shift focus to describe what happens to irrelevant input - whether it is discarded at the outset or is gradually inhibited, and whether inhibition is a perceptual or post-perceptual process. The concluding section describes the process of binding as currently understood on the basis of the literature included in the review. To summarize, it appears that initially the "object" is conceptualized as an instantaneous bundle of all features. However, only relevant features of stimuli are gradually integrated to form a stable representation of the object. Concomitantly, irrelevant features are removed from the object representations. Empirical evidence suggests that the inhibition of irrelevant features occurs over time and is presumably a process within WM.
Keywords: feature binding; inhibition; top-down and bottom-up processing.
Similar articles
-
The role of top-down suppression in mitigating the disruptive effects of task-irrelevant feature changes in visual working memory.Mem Cognit. 2017 Nov;45(8):1411-1422. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0738-8. Mem Cognit. 2017. PMID: 28741251
-
The time course of encoding and maintenance of task-relevant versus irrelevant object features in working memory.Cortex. 2019 Feb;111:196-209. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.10.013. Epub 2018 Nov 1. Cortex. 2019. PMID: 30508678 Free PMC article.
-
Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.Cognition. 2018 Mar;172:37-45. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.12.002. Epub 2017 Dec 8. Cognition. 2018. PMID: 29223864
-
Visual-spatial working memory, attention, and scene representation: a neuro-cognitive theory.Psychol Res. 1999;62(2-3):220-36. doi: 10.1007/s004260050052. Psychol Res. 1999. PMID: 10472201 Review.
-
[Feature Integration in Visual Working Memory].Brain Nerve. 2018 Jul;70(7):733-743. doi: 10.11477/mf.1416201074. Brain Nerve. 2018. PMID: 29997269 Review. Japanese.
Cited by
-
The process of feature binding.Front Psychol. 2013 Apr 18;4:207. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00207. eCollection 2013. Front Psychol. 2013. PMID: 23616781 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Object-based Encoding in Visual Working Memory: Evidence from Memory-driven Attentional Capture.Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 9;6:22822. doi: 10.1038/srep22822. Sci Rep. 2016. PMID: 26956084 Free PMC article.
-
The role of top-down suppression in mitigating the disruptive effects of task-irrelevant feature changes in visual working memory.Mem Cognit. 2017 Nov;45(8):1411-1422. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0738-8. Mem Cognit. 2017. PMID: 28741251
-
Late positive slow waves as markers of chunking during encoding.Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 28;6:1032. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01032. eCollection 2015. Front Psychol. 2015. PMID: 26283984 Free PMC article.
-
When the ignored gets bound: sequential effects in the flanker task.Front Psychol. 2013 Jan 2;3:552. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00552. eCollection 2012. Front Psychol. 2013. PMID: 23293616 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Alvarez G. A., Thompson T. (2009). Overwriting and rebinding: why feature-switch detection tasks underestimate the binding capacity of visual working memory. Vis. Cogn. 17, 141–15910.1080/13506280802265496 - DOI
-
- Baars B. J. (1988). A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources