Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Sep;4(3):556-560.
doi: 10.3892/ol.2012.776. Epub 2012 Jun 27.

Evaluation of microsatellite instability in women with epithelial ovarian cancer

Affiliations

Evaluation of microsatellite instability in women with epithelial ovarian cancer

Leonardo Pandolfi Caliman et al. Oncol Lett. 2012 Sep.

Abstract

The function of microsatellite instability (MSI) and the optimal panel of markers for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) are not well established. This study aimed to use the National Cancer Institute (NCI) markers BAT25, BAT26, D2S123, D5S346 and D17S250 to evaluate MSI in patients with ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma, compared with ovarian serous cystadenoma and normal ovaries. A total of 37 patients were divided into three groups, as follows: cystadenocarcinoma (n=13), cystadenoma (n=10) and normal ovaries (n=14). DNA was extracted with TRIzol and quantified by spectrophotometry. MSI was evaluated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and classified as high (MSI-H), low (MSI-L) or stable (MSS). FIGO staging was I/II in 23.1% and III/IV in 76.9% of the cystadenocarcinoma group. Polymorphisms were found using at least one marker in 32 women, and were observed with D2S123 (83.7%), D17S250 (81.1%), D5S346 (72.9%), BAT25 (21.6%) and BAT26 (16.2%) markers. In the cystadenocarcinoma group, BAT25, BAT26, D2S123, D5S346 and D17S250 markers were positive in 30.8, 76.9, 53.8, 69.2 and 69.2% of patients, respectively. The same markers were positive in 30, 50, 40, 60 and 30% of the cystadenoma group, and 50, 71.4, 71.4, 64.3 and 63.3% in the normal ovary group, respectively. MSI-H was present in 84.6, 60 and 78.6% of the cystadenocarcinoma, cystadenoma and normal patients, respectively. MSI-L was detected in 0, 30 and 7.1%, and MSS was identified in 15.4, 10 and 14.3% of the cystadenocarcinoma, cystadenoma and normal patients, respectively. The frequency of MSI in both benign epithelial ovarian neoplasms and in normal ovaries was high, as well as in EOC, with no statistically significant difference between the groups. This suggests that MSI may arise as a consequence of the ovulatory process, and not solely as a feature of malignant ovarian tumors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (7.5%) of NCI markers (A, C, E) and peripheral blood samples (B, D, F) of patients. (A, B) Cystadenocarcinoma, (C, D) cystadenoma, and (E, F) normal ovarian tissue. Columns 1 and 6, BAT25; 2 and 7, BAT26; 3 and 8, D2S123; 4 and 9, D5S346; and 5 and 10, D17S250. BAT25, BAT26, D2S123 (A), D2S123 (C) and BAT26, D2S123, D5S346, D17S250 (E) polymorphic alleles are present in the ovarian tissues and absent in the peripheral blood samples (B, D, F), characterized as MSI-H, MSI-L and MSI-H, respectively. L, 100-bp DNA ladder.
Figure 2
Figure 2
NCI marker frequency in cystadenocarcinoma (CystadenoCa), cystadenoma (Cyst) and normal ovaries.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Frequency of microsatellite instability (MSI). High (MSI-H), low (MSI-L) or stable (MSS).
Figure 4
Figure 4
qPCR for MLH1 and MSH2 genes in the normal ovary, cystadenoma (Cyst) and cystadenocarcinoma (EOC) groups. There was no difference in gene expression levels between groups, when compared by the Kruskal-Wallis test.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Silva-Filho AL, Carmo GA, Athayde GR, Assis ME, Almeida RC, Leal RH, Lamaita RM, Santos-Júnior JL, Castro e Silva JG. Safe fertility-preserving management in gynecological malignancies. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2007;275:321–330. - PubMed
    1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:225–249. - PubMed
    1. Dorigo O, Berek JS. Personalizing CA125 levels for ovarian cancer screening. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2011;4:1356–1359. - PubMed
    1. Brewer MA, Johnson K, Follen M, Gershenson D, Bast R., Jr Prevention of ovarian cancer: intraepithelial neoplasia. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:20–30. - PubMed
    1. Roett MA, Evans P. Ovarian cancer: an overview. Am Fam Physician. 2009;80:609–616. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources