Evaluation of microsatellite instability in women with epithelial ovarian cancer
- PMID: 22970055
- PMCID: PMC3439170
- DOI: 10.3892/ol.2012.776
Evaluation of microsatellite instability in women with epithelial ovarian cancer
Abstract
The function of microsatellite instability (MSI) and the optimal panel of markers for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) are not well established. This study aimed to use the National Cancer Institute (NCI) markers BAT25, BAT26, D2S123, D5S346 and D17S250 to evaluate MSI in patients with ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma, compared with ovarian serous cystadenoma and normal ovaries. A total of 37 patients were divided into three groups, as follows: cystadenocarcinoma (n=13), cystadenoma (n=10) and normal ovaries (n=14). DNA was extracted with TRIzol and quantified by spectrophotometry. MSI was evaluated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and classified as high (MSI-H), low (MSI-L) or stable (MSS). FIGO staging was I/II in 23.1% and III/IV in 76.9% of the cystadenocarcinoma group. Polymorphisms were found using at least one marker in 32 women, and were observed with D2S123 (83.7%), D17S250 (81.1%), D5S346 (72.9%), BAT25 (21.6%) and BAT26 (16.2%) markers. In the cystadenocarcinoma group, BAT25, BAT26, D2S123, D5S346 and D17S250 markers were positive in 30.8, 76.9, 53.8, 69.2 and 69.2% of patients, respectively. The same markers were positive in 30, 50, 40, 60 and 30% of the cystadenoma group, and 50, 71.4, 71.4, 64.3 and 63.3% in the normal ovary group, respectively. MSI-H was present in 84.6, 60 and 78.6% of the cystadenocarcinoma, cystadenoma and normal patients, respectively. MSI-L was detected in 0, 30 and 7.1%, and MSS was identified in 15.4, 10 and 14.3% of the cystadenocarcinoma, cystadenoma and normal patients, respectively. The frequency of MSI in both benign epithelial ovarian neoplasms and in normal ovaries was high, as well as in EOC, with no statistically significant difference between the groups. This suggests that MSI may arise as a consequence of the ovulatory process, and not solely as a feature of malignant ovarian tumors.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Sensitivity and polymorphism of Bethesda panel markers in Chinese population.Bull Cancer. 2020 Nov;107(11):1091-1097. doi: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Sep 23. Bull Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32980144
-
Application of the National Cancer Institute international criteria for determination of microsatellite instability in ovarian cancer.Cancer Res. 2001 Jun 1;61(11):4371-4. Cancer Res. 2001. PMID: 11389062
-
Incidence of microsatellite instability in synchronous tumors of the ovary and endometrium.Clin Cancer Res. 2003 Apr;9(4):1387-92. Clin Cancer Res. 2003. PMID: 12684409
-
Microsatellite instability and gastric non-invasive neoplasia in a high risk population in Cesena, Italy.J Clin Pathol. 2005 Aug;58(8):805-10. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2004.025676. J Clin Pathol. 2005. PMID: 16049280 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Recent Incidence Trend of Surgically Resected Esophagogastric Junction Adenocarcinoma and Microsatellite Instability Status in Japanese Patients.Digestion. 2019;99(1):6-13. doi: 10.1159/000494406. Epub 2018 Dec 14. Digestion. 2019. PMID: 30554205 Review.
Cited by
-
Correlations between microsatellite instability and the biological behaviour of tumours.J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2019 Dec;145(12):2891-2899. doi: 10.1007/s00432-019-03053-4. Epub 2019 Oct 15. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31617076 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Screening for Lynch syndrome using risk assessment criteria in patients with ovarian cancer.J Gynecol Oncol. 2018 May;29(3):e29. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e29. Epub 2018 Jan 30. J Gynecol Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29400022 Free PMC article.
-
Mismatch Repair Protein Loss as a Prognostic and Predictive Biomarker in Breast Cancers Regardless of Microsatellite Instability.JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2018 Dec 13;2(4):pky056. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pky056. eCollection 2018 Oct. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2018. PMID: 31360876 Free PMC article.
-
Somatic microsatellite variability as a predictive marker for colorectal cancer and liver cancer progression.Oncotarget. 2015 Mar 20;6(8):5760-71. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3306. Oncotarget. 2015. PMID: 25691061 Free PMC article.
-
Association between IHC and MSI testing to identify mismatch repair-deficient patients with ovarian cancer.Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2014 Apr;18(4):229-35. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2013.0393. Epub 2014 Mar 4. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2014. PMID: 24592941 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Silva-Filho AL, Carmo GA, Athayde GR, Assis ME, Almeida RC, Leal RH, Lamaita RM, Santos-Júnior JL, Castro e Silva JG. Safe fertility-preserving management in gynecological malignancies. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2007;275:321–330. - PubMed
-
- Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:225–249. - PubMed
-
- Dorigo O, Berek JS. Personalizing CA125 levels for ovarian cancer screening. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2011;4:1356–1359. - PubMed
-
- Brewer MA, Johnson K, Follen M, Gershenson D, Bast R., Jr Prevention of ovarian cancer: intraepithelial neoplasia. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:20–30. - PubMed
-
- Roett MA, Evans P. Ovarian cancer: an overview. Am Fam Physician. 2009;80:609–616. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources