Understanding barriers to routine HIV screening: knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare providers in King County, Washington
- PMID: 22970215
- PMCID: PMC3435280
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044417
Understanding barriers to routine HIV screening: knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare providers in King County, Washington
Abstract
Objective: In 2006, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended routine HIV screening in healthcare settings for persons between 13 and 64 years old. In 2010, the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) was changed to align testing rules with these recommendations. We designed this survey to ascertain the current state of HIV testing and barriers to routine screening in King County, Washington.
Methods: Between March 23 and April 16, 2010, a convenience sample of healthcare providers completed an online survey. Providers answered true-false and multiple choice questions about national recommendations and the WAC, policies in their primary clinical settings, and their personal HIV testing practices. Providers were asked to agree or disagree whether commonly reported barriers limited their implementation of routine HIV screening.
Results: Although 76% of the 221 respondents knew that the CDC recommended routine HIV screening for persons regardless of their risk, 99 (45%) providers reported that their primary clinical setting had a policy to target testing based on patient risk factors. Forty-four (20%) providers reported that their primary clinical setting had a policy of routine HIV screening, 54 (25%) reported no official policy, and 15 (7%) did not know whether a policy existed. Only 11 (5%) providers offer HIV testing to all patients at initial visits. When asked about barriers to routine screening, 57% of providers agreed that perception that their patient population is low risk limits the number of HIV tests they perform. Only 26 (13%) providers agreed that concern about reimbursement posed a barrier to testing.
Conclusions: Most providers participating in this survey continue to target HIV testing, despite knowledge of national recommendations. Efforts are still needed to educate providers and policymakers, clarify the recent WAC revisions, and implement structural changes in order to increase HIV testing in Washington State.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Scaling up routine HIV testing at specialty clinics: assessing the effectiveness of an academic detailing approach.J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013 Nov 1;64 Suppl 1(0 1):S14-9. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182a90167. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013. PMID: 24126444 Free PMC article.
-
A Systematic Review of Health Care Provider-Perceived Barriers and Facilitators to Routine HIV Testing in Primary Care Settings in the Southeastern United States.J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2018 May-Jun;29(3):357-370. doi: 10.1016/j.jana.2017.12.006. Epub 2017 Dec 27. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2018. PMID: 29331504 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers to HIV Testing: Patient and Provider Perspectives in the Deep South.AIDS Behav. 2019 Apr;23(4):1062-1072. doi: 10.1007/s10461-018-02385-5. AIDS Behav. 2019. PMID: 30607759 Free PMC article.
-
HIV and Hepatitis C Virus Screening Practices in a Geographically Diverse Sample of American Community Health Centers.AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2016 Jun;30(6):237-46. doi: 10.1089/apc.2015.0314. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2016. PMID: 27286294
-
Why don't physicians test for HIV? A review of the US literature.AIDS. 2007 Jul 31;21(12):1617-24. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32823f91ff. AIDS. 2007. PMID: 17630557 Review.
Cited by
-
A Novel Approach to Realizing Routine HIV Screening and Enhancing Linkage to Care in the United States: Protocol of the FOCUS Program and Early Results.JMIR Res Protoc. 2014 Jul 31;3(3):e39. doi: 10.2196/resprot.3378. JMIR Res Protoc. 2014. PMID: 25093431 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment and improvement of HIV screening rates in a Midwest primary care practice using an electronic clinical decision support system: a quality improvement study.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Jul 4;16:76. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0320-5. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016. PMID: 27378268 Free PMC article.
-
Awareness of HIV testing guidelines is low among Swiss emergency doctors: a survey of five teaching hospitals in French-speaking Switzerland.PLoS One. 2013 Sep 6;8(9):e72812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072812. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 24039804 Free PMC article.
-
HIV Testing Among Men at Risk for Acquiring HIV Infection Before and After the 2006 CDC Recommendations.Public Health Rep. 2016 Mar-Apr;131(2):311-9. doi: 10.1177/003335491613100215. Public Health Rep. 2016. PMID: 26957666 Free PMC article.
-
Pediatric primary care provider practices, knowledge, and attitudes of human immunodeficiency virus screening among adolescents.J Pediatr. 2013 Dec;163(6):1711-1715.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.08.023. Epub 2013 Sep 29. J Pediatr. 2013. PMID: 24084105 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Branson BM, Handsfield HH, Lampe MA, Janssen RS, Taylor AW, et al. (2006) Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. MMWR Recomm Rep, 55: 1–17; quiz CE11–14. - PubMed
-
- HIV prevalence estimates–United States, 2006 (2008) MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 57: 1073–1076. - PubMed
-
- Late HIV testing - 34 states, 1996–2005 (2009) MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 58: 661–665. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous