Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012;7(9):e44417.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044417. Epub 2012 Sep 6.

Understanding barriers to routine HIV screening: knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare providers in King County, Washington

Affiliations

Understanding barriers to routine HIV screening: knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare providers in King County, Washington

Alexandra Shirreffs et al. PLoS One. 2012.

Abstract

Objective: In 2006, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended routine HIV screening in healthcare settings for persons between 13 and 64 years old. In 2010, the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) was changed to align testing rules with these recommendations. We designed this survey to ascertain the current state of HIV testing and barriers to routine screening in King County, Washington.

Methods: Between March 23 and April 16, 2010, a convenience sample of healthcare providers completed an online survey. Providers answered true-false and multiple choice questions about national recommendations and the WAC, policies in their primary clinical settings, and their personal HIV testing practices. Providers were asked to agree or disagree whether commonly reported barriers limited their implementation of routine HIV screening.

Results: Although 76% of the 221 respondents knew that the CDC recommended routine HIV screening for persons regardless of their risk, 99 (45%) providers reported that their primary clinical setting had a policy to target testing based on patient risk factors. Forty-four (20%) providers reported that their primary clinical setting had a policy of routine HIV screening, 54 (25%) reported no official policy, and 15 (7%) did not know whether a policy existed. Only 11 (5%) providers offer HIV testing to all patients at initial visits. When asked about barriers to routine screening, 57% of providers agreed that perception that their patient population is low risk limits the number of HIV tests they perform. Only 26 (13%) providers agreed that concern about reimbursement posed a barrier to testing.

Conclusions: Most providers participating in this survey continue to target HIV testing, despite knowledge of national recommendations. Efforts are still needed to educate providers and policymakers, clarify the recent WAC revisions, and implement structural changes in order to increase HIV testing in Washington State.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Branson BM, Handsfield HH, Lampe MA, Janssen RS, Taylor AW, et al. (2006) Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. MMWR Recomm Rep, 55: 1–17; quiz CE11–14. - PubMed
    1. HIV prevalence estimates–United States, 2006 (2008) MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 57: 1073–1076. - PubMed
    1. Late HIV testing - 34 states, 1996–2005 (2009) MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 58: 661–665. - PubMed
    1. Ogbuanu IU, Torres ME, Kettinger L, Albrecht H, Duffus WA (2009) Epidemiological characterization of individuals with newly reported HIV infection: South Carolina, 2004–2005. Am J Public Health 99 Suppl 1S111–117. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liddicoat RV, Horton NJ, Urban R, Maier E, Christiansen D, et al. (2004) Assessing missed opportunities for HIV testing in medical settings. J Gen Intern Med 19: 349–356. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types