Primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) reduces the incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) receiving CHOP chemotherapy treatment without adversely affecting their quality of life: cost-benefit and quality of life analysis
- PMID: 22972488
- DOI: 10.1007/s00520-012-1589-2
Primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) reduces the incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) receiving CHOP chemotherapy treatment without adversely affecting their quality of life: cost-benefit and quality of life analysis
Abstract
Purpose: Treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) with cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin and prednisone (CHOP) is known to be associated with a significant risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) of up to 50% [Osby et al. 2003 Blood 101(10): 3840-3848; Lyman and Delgado 2003 Cancer 98(11): 2402-2409]. This study sought to examine the impact of primary granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) prophylaxis on the incidence of FN, quality of life and overall cost.
Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, a group of 65 consecutive patients who received CHOP chemotherapy for NHL between December 2006 and October 2009 was studied. Patients either received filgrastim (300 mcg, average of seven doses), pegylated filgrastim (6 mg, single dose), or no GCSF prophylaxis. In addition, 19 patients were asked to complete Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: General quality-of-life questionnaires.
Results: Overall, patients who received primary GCSF prophylaxis had significantly fewer FN compared to those who did not (5 vs. 60%, p < 0.0001; numbers needed to treat of 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-2.9). Cost-benefit analysis showed that the GCSF prophylaxis was associated with only a small increase in direct financial cost ($238 NZD [US$189] more to give primary GCSF prophylaxis per patient vs. no prophylaxis). The quality of life assessment showed that the patients' quality of life scores were similar to the published data from the validation study population (466 patients with mixed cancers) for Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy.
Conclusions: Our study shows that primary GCSF prophylaxis is effective in preventing FN in patients receiving CHOP chemotherapy for NHL without adversely affecting their quality of life, and is cost effective.
Similar articles
-
Days of prophylactic filgrastim use to reduce febrile neutropenia in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with chemotherapy.J Manag Care Pharm. 2003 Mar-Apr;9(2 Suppl):15-21. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2003.9.s2.15. J Manag Care Pharm. 2003. PMID: 14613340 Free PMC article.
-
Routine Primary Prophylaxis for Febrile Neutropenia with Biosimilar Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (Nivestim) or Pegfilgrastim Is Cost Effective in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients undergoing Curative-Intent R-CHOP Chemotherapy.PLoS One. 2016 Feb 12;11(2):e0148901. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148901. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 26871584 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus 6-day filgrastim primary prophylaxis in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving CHOP-21 in United States.Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Feb;25(2):401-11. doi: 10.1185/03007990802636817. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009. PMID: 19192985
-
Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim for prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with lymphoma: a systematic review.BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 30;22(1):1600. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08933-z. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022. PMID: 36585648 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of pegfilgrastim prescribing practice to national guidelines at a university hospital outpatient oncology clinic.J Oncol Pract. 2013 Jul;9(4):203-6. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2012.000662. Epub 2012 Nov 6. J Oncol Pract. 2013. PMID: 23942922 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Granulocyte growth factor use in elderly patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in the United States: adherence to guidelines and comparative effectiveness.Support Care Cancer. 2016 Jun;24(6):2695-706. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3079-4. Epub 2016 Jan 21. Support Care Cancer. 2016. PMID: 26797253
-
Use and effectiveness of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in US clinical practice:a retrospective observational study.BMC Cancer. 2019 Aug 9;19(1):792. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6010-9. BMC Cancer. 2019. PMID: 31399079 Free PMC article.
-
Economic burden and quality of life caused by non-hodgkin lymphoma cancer in Iran.J Health Popul Nutr. 2025 Aug 6;44(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s41043-025-01033-8. J Health Popul Nutr. 2025. PMID: 40770373 Free PMC article.
-
The Effectiveness of Febrile Neutropenia Prophylaxis with Lipegfilgrastim in Routine Clinical Practice.In Vivo. 2017 May-Jun;31(3):303-306. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11059. In Vivo. 2017. PMID: 28438855 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Model-based optimization of G-CSF treatment during cytotoxic chemotherapy.J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb;144(2):343-358. doi: 10.1007/s00432-017-2540-1. Epub 2017 Nov 4. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29103159 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous