Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012:2012:605743.
doi: 10.1100/2012/605743. Epub 2012 Aug 22.

An assessment of whole blood and fractions by nested PCR as a DNA source for diagnosing canine ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis

Affiliations

An assessment of whole blood and fractions by nested PCR as a DNA source for diagnosing canine ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis

Tereza Emmanuelle de Farias Rotondano et al. ScientificWorldJournal. 2012.

Abstract

Ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis are tick-borne diseases. Ehrlichia canis and Anaplasma platys infect mainly white cells and platelets, respectively. The main DNA source for PCR is peripheral blood, but the potential of blood cell fractions has not been extensively investigated. This study aims at assessment of whole blood (WB) and blood fractions potential in nested PCR (nPCR) to diagnose canine ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis. The 16S rRNA gene was amplified in 71.4, 17.8, 31.57, and 30% of the WB, granulocyte (G), mononuclear cells (M), and buffy coat (BC) samples. Compared to the WB, the sensitivity of the PCR was 42.86% for the M, and BC fractions, 21.43% for the G, and 33.33% for the blood clot (C). There was fair agreement between the WB and M, BC and C, and slight with the G. Fair agreement occurred between the nPCR and morulae in the blood smear. One animal was coinfected with A. platys and E. canis. This study provided the first evidence of A. platys infection in dogs in Paraíba, Brazil, and demonstrated that WB is a better DNA source than blood fractions to detect Ehrlichia and Anaplasma by nPCR, probably because of the plasma bacterial concentration following host cell lysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Detection of Ehrlichia canis in nPCR with EHCA sense and antisense primers for rRNA 16S gene. Lane 1: 100 base pair (bp) DNA ladder; lanes from 2 to 5: nPCR with DNA from WB; lane 6: E. canis-positive control and DNA from WB; lane 7: negative control; lane 8: nPCR-negative control.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dagnone AS, Souza AI, André MR, Machado RZ. Molecular diagnosis of Anaplasmataceae organisms in dogs with clinical and microscopical signs of ehrlichiosis. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinaria. 2009;18(4):20–25. - PubMed
    1. Cohn LA. Ehrlichiosis and related infections. Veterinary Clinics of North America. 2003;33(4):863–884. - PubMed
    1. Dantas-Torres F, Figueredo LA, Brandão-Filho SP. Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Acari: Ixodidae), the brown dog tick, parasitizing humans in Brazil. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical. 2006;39(1):64–67. - PubMed
    1. Figueiredo LTM, Badra SJ, Pereira LE, Szabó MPJ. Report on ticks collected in the Southeast and Mid-West regions of Brazil: analyzing the potential transmission of tick-borne pathogens to man. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical. 1999;32(6):613–619. - PubMed
    1. Ramos CAN, Ramos RAN, Araújo FR, Guedes DS, Jr., Souza IIF. Ono TM. Comparação de nested-PCR com o diagnóstico direto na detecção de Ehrlichia canis e Anaplasma platys em cães. Revista Brasileira De Parasitologia Veterinária. 2009;18:58–62. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources