Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Dec;16(12):1583-9.

A comparison between early maternal and neonatal complications of restrictive episiotomy and routine episiotomy in primiparous vaginal delivery

Azar Danesh Shahraki  1 , Shahnaz Aram, Soodabeh Pourkabirian, Sepideh Khodaee, Shekofeh Choupannejad
Affiliations

A comparison between early maternal and neonatal complications of restrictive episiotomy and routine episiotomy in primiparous vaginal delivery

Azar Danesh Shahraki et al. J Res Med Sci. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Routine episiotomy is a controversial issue among gynecologists. The aim of this study was to compare early maternal and neonatal complications of restrictive episiotomy and routine episiotomy in primiparus vaginal delivery.

Methods: In this descriptive cross-sectional study, two groups of primiparus normal vaginal delivery (NVD) cases with routine and restrictive episiotomy were studied. Immediately and in the first 24 and 48 hours after delivery, specific charts were used to compare the two groups in terms of perineal laceration size, neonatal Apgar score and post-delivery. For data analysis, SPSS was used to conduct student t-test and Kruskal-Wallis test. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: Forty primiparus pregnant women were studied in each group. Episiotomy was performed in 7.5% of the restrictive group. Perineal laceration was measured as 3.68 ± 0.47 cm and 1.21 ± 1.1 in routine and restrictive episiotomy groups, respectively (p < 0.05). Intact perineum or first-degree laceration was seen in 80% of the restrictive group. However, second- and third-degree laceration were respectively observed in 75% and 15% of the routine episiotomy group (p < 0.05). Pain relief (immediately, 24 and 48 hours after delivery) was significantly higher in the restrictive group (p < 0.05). On the contrary, no significant difference in Apgar scores at the first and fifth minutes after birth was found between the two groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: Restrictive episiotomy results in low maternal complications. Therefore, avoiding routine episiotomy in unnecessary conditions would increase the rate of intact perineal and minor perineal trauma and reduce postpartum delivery pain with no adverse effects neither on maternal nor neonatal morbidities.

Keywords: Episiotomy; Normal Vaginal Delivery (NVD); Perineal Laceration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interests Authors have no conflict of interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The prevalence of different laceration grades in routine and restrictive episiotomy groups (p < 0.05 in all grades)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Maximum pain severity according to Visual Analog Scale (VAS) charts in routine and restrictive episiotomy groups (p < 0.001)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Weeks JD, Kozak LJ. Trends in the use of episiotomy in the United States: 1980-1998. Birth. 2001;28(3):152–60. - PubMed
    1. Carroli G, Mignini L. Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(1):CD000081. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kok J, Tan KH, Koh S, Cheng PS, Lim WY, Yew ML, et al. Antenatal use of a novel vaginal birth training device by term primiparous women in Singapore. Singapore Med J. 2004;45(7):318–23. - PubMed
    1. de Tayrac R, Panel L, Masson G, Mares P. Episiotomy and prevention of perineal and pelvic floor injuries. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2006;35(1 Suppl):1S24–31. [In French] - PubMed
    1. Hartmann K, Viswanathan M, Palmieri R, Gartlehner G, Thorp J, Jr, Lohr KN. Outcomes of routine episiotomy: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005;293(17):2141–8. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources