Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Sep;16(9):1129-38.

A randomized comparative trial of combinational methods for preventing post-spinal hypotension at elective cesarean delivery

Affiliations

A randomized comparative trial of combinational methods for preventing post-spinal hypotension at elective cesarean delivery

Mitra Jabalameli et al. J Res Med Sci. 2011 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Various methods have been applied to prevent maternal hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. We compared the efficacy of three combinational methods in this regard in the current study.

Methods: In this randomized comparative trial, 150 candidates of elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were assigned to three groups: crystalloid preload and leg bandage, colloid preload and leg bandage, and ephedrine and leg bandage. Maternal hemodynamic changes during 60 minutes after spinal injection and neonatal condition were compared among the groups.

Results: The cumulative incidence of hypotension was 54%, 64%, and 36% in groups 1 to 3, respectively (p = 0.018). Spinal injection to hypotension interval was similar among the groups (p = 0.828). Heart rate in group 3 was significantly lower at the most time measures after anesthesia compared with the other two groups (p < 0.05 to <0.001). Regarding neonatal outcomes, the interval between the birth and the first breath was longer and the Apgar score at minute 1 was lower in group 3 compared with the other groups (p < 0.001 and 0.038, respectively) but it was not clinically important. Umbilical cord blood pH was similar among the three groups (p = 0.248).

Conclusions: Among the three studied methods, administration of ephedrine plus bandage of the lower extremities was the most effective one in reducing the incidence of post-spinal hypotension. The groups were not clinically different concerning the effect of treatment on newborn health.

Keywords: Apgar Score; Cesarean Delivery; Hypotension; Prophylaxis; Spinal Anesthesia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interests Authors have no conflict of interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of enrolled study patients.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Systolic blood pressure changes during 60 minutes after spinal injection Group 1: Crystalloid+leg bandage Group 2: Colloid+leg bandage Group 3: Ephedrine+leg bandage p < 0.001
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier survival curves showing the proportion of patients who remained not hypotensive until 60 minutes after anesthesia Group 1: Crystalloid+leg bandage Group 2: Colloid+leg bandage Group 3: Ephedrine+leg bandage p = 0.828

References

    1. Klohr S, Roth R, Hofmann T, Rossaint R, Heesen M. Definitions of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: literature search and application to parturients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010;54(8):909–21. - PubMed
    1. Reynolds F, Seed PT. Anaesthesia for Caesarean section and neonatal acid-base status: a meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2005;60(7):636–53. - PubMed
    1. Cyna AM, Andrew M, Emmett RS, Middleton P, Simmons SW. Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(4):CD002251. - PubMed
    1. Kuczkopwski KM, Reisner LS, Lin D. Anesthesia for cesarean section. In: Chestnut DH, Polley LS, Tsen LC, Wong CA, editors. Chestnut's Obstetric Anesthesia: Principles and Practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby; 2009. pp. 422–5.
    1. Morgan PJ, Halpern SH, Tarshis J. The effects of an increase of central blood volume before spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a qualitative systematic review. Anesth Analg. 2001;92(4):997–1005. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources