Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2014 Jun;11(3):278-82.
doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01088.x. Epub 2012 Sep 13.

Giant squamous cell carcinoma as a complication of a chronic enterocutaneous fistula: complex parietal reconstruction

Affiliations
Case Reports

Giant squamous cell carcinoma as a complication of a chronic enterocutaneous fistula: complex parietal reconstruction

Lionel Rebibo et al. Int Wound J. 2014 Jun.

Abstract

Treatment of an enterocutaneous fistula is complex and may require multidisciplinary management, especially when associated with a neoplastic process. Here, we describe the case of a 59-year-old patient with a squamous cell carcinoma that had invaded the abdominal wall through a chronic enterocutaneous fistula identified 30 years ago. We combined parietectomy with small intestine and colon resection and inguinal lymphadenectomy in order to obtain clear surgical margins. At the same time, plastic surgery involved the implementation of a large bioprosthesis and coverage with a vastus lateralis muscle free flap.

Keywords: Abdominal parietectomy; Bioprosthesis; Parietal squamous cell carcinoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A local view during preoperative vacuum therapy. Σ: enterocutaneous fistula, X: old drain hole in the left flank.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Preoperative CT scan. Σ: A tumour infiltrating the sheath of the rectus abdominis, φ: a tumour infiltrating the left oblique muscle and X: a carcinomatosis lesion infiltrating the small intestine.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Intraoperative photographs. (A) Plot of the resection area and free flap harvesting zone (Ω). (B) En bloc resection of the abdominal wall and the small intestine. (C) Implementation of bioprostheses (ø) with one ileostomy (Σ) and one colostomy (X) through the prostheses. (D) Local view at the end of surgery.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Postoperative CT scan and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. (A) A CT scan highlighting the bioprostheses in the abdominal wall (Ω) and the colocolonic fistula directed to the abdominal wall (Σ). (B) Lower gastrointestinal endoscopy showing the partially covered colonic stent.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Histological analysis of the surgical specimen.

Similar articles

References

    1. Mc Cune WS, Thistlethwaite JR. Fistula cancer. Ann Surg 1959;149:815–20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Draus JMJr, Huss SA, Harty NJ, Cheadle WG, Larson GM. Enterocutaneous fistula: are treatments improving? Surgery 2006;140:570–6. - PubMed
    1. Tassiopoulos AK, Baum G, Halverson JD. Small bowel fistulas. Surg Clin North Am 1996;76:1175–81. - PubMed
    1. Lloyd DA, Gabe SM, Windsor AC. Nutrition and management of enterocutaneous fistula. Br J Surg 2006;93:1045–55. - PubMed
    1. Soeters PB, Ebeid AM, Fischer JE. Review of 404 patients with gastrointestinal fistulas. Impact of parenteral nutrition. Ann Surg 1979;190:189–202. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms