Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Mar;23(3):664-72.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2649-1. Epub 2012 Sep 14.

Performance comparison of single-view digital breast tomosynthesis plus single-view digital mammography with two-view digital mammography

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Performance comparison of single-view digital breast tomosynthesis plus single-view digital mammography with two-view digital mammography

Gisella Gennaro et al. Eur Radiol. 2013 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the performance of combined single-view mediolateral oblique (MLO) digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus single-view cranio-caudal (CC) mammography (MX) compared with that of standard two-view digital mammography.

Methods: A multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) study was conducted, involving six breast radiologists. Two hundred fifty patients underwent bilateral MX and DBT imaging. MX and DBT images with the adjunct of the CC-MX view from 469 breasts were evaluated and rated independently by six readers. Differences in mean areas under the ROC curves (AUCs), mean sensitivity and mean specificity were analysed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) to assess clinical performance.

Results: The combined technique was found to be non-inferior to standard two-view mammography (MX((CC+MLO))) in mean AUC (difference: +0.021;95 % LCL = -0.011), but was not statistically significant for superiority (P = 0.197). The combined technique had equivalent sensitivity to standard mammography (76.2 % vs. 72.8 %, P = 0.269) and equivalent specificity (84.9 % vs. 83.0 %, P = 0.130). Specificity for benign lesions was significantly higher with the combination of techniques versus mammography (45.6 % vs. 36.8 %, P = 0.002).

Conclusion: In this enriched study population, the combination of single-view MLO tomosynthesis plus single-view CC mammography was non-inferior to that of standard two-view digital mammography in terms of ROC curve area, sensitivity and specificity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Br J Radiol. 2012 Nov;85(1019):e1074-82 - PubMed
    1. Eur Radiol. 2011 Jun;21(6):1207-13 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 2007 Apr;243(1):10-2 - PubMed
    1. Stat Med. 2007 Feb 10;26(3):596-619 - PubMed
    1. Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med. 2004 Aug 17;5(1):8 - PubMed

Publication types