Performance comparison of single-view digital breast tomosynthesis plus single-view digital mammography with two-view digital mammography
- PMID: 22976919
- DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2649-1
Performance comparison of single-view digital breast tomosynthesis plus single-view digital mammography with two-view digital mammography
Abstract
Objective: To determine the performance of combined single-view mediolateral oblique (MLO) digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus single-view cranio-caudal (CC) mammography (MX) compared with that of standard two-view digital mammography.
Methods: A multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) study was conducted, involving six breast radiologists. Two hundred fifty patients underwent bilateral MX and DBT imaging. MX and DBT images with the adjunct of the CC-MX view from 469 breasts were evaluated and rated independently by six readers. Differences in mean areas under the ROC curves (AUCs), mean sensitivity and mean specificity were analysed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) to assess clinical performance.
Results: The combined technique was found to be non-inferior to standard two-view mammography (MX((CC+MLO))) in mean AUC (difference: +0.021;95 % LCL = -0.011), but was not statistically significant for superiority (P = 0.197). The combined technique had equivalent sensitivity to standard mammography (76.2 % vs. 72.8 %, P = 0.269) and equivalent specificity (84.9 % vs. 83.0 %, P = 0.130). Specificity for benign lesions was significantly higher with the combination of techniques versus mammography (45.6 % vs. 36.8 %, P = 0.002).
Conclusion: In this enriched study population, the combination of single-view MLO tomosynthesis plus single-view CC mammography was non-inferior to that of standard two-view digital mammography in terms of ROC curve area, sensitivity and specificity.
Similar articles
-
Digital breast tomosynthesis versus mammography and breast ultrasound: a multireader performance study.Eur Radiol. 2013 Sep;23(9):2441-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2863-5. Epub 2013 May 15. Eur Radiol. 2013. PMID: 23673573
-
Combination of one-view digital breast tomosynthesis with one-view digital mammography versus standard two-view digital mammography: per lesion analysis.Eur Radiol. 2013 Aug;23(8):2087-94. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2831-0. Epub 2013 Apr 26. Eur Radiol. 2013. PMID: 23620367
-
Detection and characterization of breast lesions in a selective diagnostic population: diagnostic accuracy study for comparison between one-view digital breast tomosynthesis and two-view full-field digital mammography.Br J Radiol. 2016 Jun;89(1062):20150743. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150743. Epub 2016 Apr 13. Br J Radiol. 2016. PMID: 27072391 Free PMC article.
-
Strategies to Increase Cancer Detection: Review of True-Positive and False-Negative Results at Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening.Radiographics. 2016 Nov-Dec;36(7):1954-1965. doi: 10.1148/rg.2016160049. Epub 2016 Oct 7. Radiographics. 2016. PMID: 27715711 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Digital breast tomosynthesis.Radiol Technol. 2009 Sep-Oct;81(1):57M-74M. Radiol Technol. 2009. PMID: 19738189 Review.
Cited by
-
Epidemiology of Breast Cancer - Current Figures and Trends.Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2013 Feb;73(2):130-135. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1328075. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2013. PMID: 24771909 Free PMC article.
-
Digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer detection: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Radiol. 2020 Apr;30(4):2058-2071. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06549-2. Epub 2020 Jan 3. Eur Radiol. 2020. PMID: 31900699
-
Stand-Alone Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Detection in Mammography: Comparison With 101 Radiologists.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Sep 1;111(9):916-922. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy222. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019. PMID: 30834436 Free PMC article.
-
Digital breast tomosynthesis versus mammography and breast ultrasound: a multireader performance study.Eur Radiol. 2013 Sep;23(9):2441-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2863-5. Epub 2013 May 15. Eur Radiol. 2013. PMID: 23673573
-
Review of radiation dose estimates in digital breast tomosynthesis relative to those in two-view full-field digital mammography.Breast. 2015 Apr;24(2):93-9. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.12.002. Epub 2014 Dec 29. Breast. 2015. PMID: 25554018 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical